From ff64c7d8c07f5226125791bae34cad1a8ee2d525 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 12:43:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86/rdrand: Remove "nordrand" flag in favor of "random.trust_cpu" The decision of whether or not to trust RDRAND is controlled by the "random.trust_cpu" boot time parameter or the CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_CPU compile time default. The "nordrand" flag was added during the early days of RDRAND, when there were worries that merely using its values could compromise the RNG. However, these days, RDRAND values are not used directly but always go through the RNG's hash function, making "nordrand" no longer useful. Rather, the correct switch is "random.trust_cpu", which not only handles the relevant trust issue directly, but also is general to multiple CPU types, not just x86. However, x86 RDRAND does have a history of being occasionally problematic. Prior, when the kernel would notice something strange, it'd warn in dmesg and suggest enabling "nordrand". We can improve on that by making the test a little bit better and then taking the step of automatically disabling RDRAND if we detect it's problematic. Also disable RDSEED if the RDRAND test fails. Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Theodore Ts'o Suggested-by: H. Peter Anvin Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov Acked-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld --- .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 -- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdrand.c | 57 +++++++------------ 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index f2d26cb7e8539..1e2307f111050 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -3733,11 +3733,6 @@ noreplace-smp [X86-32,SMP] Don't replace SMP instructions with UP alternatives - nordrand [X86] Disable kernel use of the RDRAND and - RDSEED instructions even if they are supported - by the processor. RDRAND and RDSEED are still - available to user space applications. - noresume [SWSUSP] Disables resume and restores original swap space. diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index 35d5288394cb8..48276c0e479d8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ static void clear_rdrand_cpuid_bit(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) return; /* - * The nordrand option can clear X86_FEATURE_RDRAND, so check for + * The self-test can clear X86_FEATURE_RDRAND, so check for * RDRAND support using the CPUID function directly. */ if (!(cpuid_ecx(1) & BIT(30)) || rdrand_force) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdrand.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdrand.c index 8f216669ecb81..26a427fa84eab 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdrand.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdrand.c @@ -11,54 +11,39 @@ #include #include -static int __init x86_rdrand_setup(char *s) -{ - setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RDRAND); - setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RDSEED); - return 1; -} -__setup("nordrand", x86_rdrand_setup); - /* * RDRAND has Built-In-Self-Test (BIST) that runs on every invocation. - * Run the instruction a few times as a sanity check. - * If it fails, it is simple to disable RDRAND here. + * Run the instruction a few times as a sanity check. Also make sure + * it's not outputting the same value over and over, which has happened + * as a result of past CPU bugs. + * + * If it fails, it is simple to disable RDRAND and RDSEED here. */ -#define SANITY_CHECK_LOOPS 8 void x86_init_rdrand(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { - unsigned int changed = 0; - unsigned long tmp, prev; - int i; + enum { SAMPLES = 8, MIN_CHANGE = 5 }; + unsigned long sample, prev; + bool failure = false; + size_t i, changed; if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND)) return; - for (i = 0; i < SANITY_CHECK_LOOPS; i++) { - if (!rdrand_long(&tmp)) { - clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND); - pr_warn_once("rdrand: disabled\n"); - return; + for (changed = 0, i = 0; i < SAMPLES; ++i) { + if (!rdrand_long(&sample)) { + failure = true; + break; } + changed += i && sample != prev; + prev = sample; } + if (changed < MIN_CHANGE) + failure = true; - /* - * Stupid sanity-check whether RDRAND does *actually* generate - * some at least random-looking data. - */ - prev = tmp; - for (i = 0; i < SANITY_CHECK_LOOPS; i++) { - if (rdrand_long(&tmp)) { - if (prev != tmp) - changed++; - - prev = tmp; - } + if (failure) { + clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND); + clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_RDSEED); + pr_emerg("RDRAND is not reliable on this platform; disabling.\n"); } - - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!changed)) - pr_emerg( -"RDRAND gives funky smelling output, might consider not using it by booting with \"nordrand\""); - } -- 2.39.5