From f97d27d70b7e0c80cfbd3efc1bc7c16168ab61d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:21:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: defrag: remove an ambiguous condition for rejection From the very beginning of btrfs defrag, there is a check to reject extents which meet both conditions: - Physically adjacent We may want to defrag physically adjacent extents to reduce the number of extents or the size of subvolume tree. - Larger than 128K This may be there for compressed extents, but unfortunately 128K is exactly the max capacity for compressed extents. And the check is > 128K, thus it never rejects compressed extents. Furthermore, the compressed extent capacity bug is fixed by previous patch, there is no reason for that check anymore. The original check has a very small ranges to reject (the target extent size is > 128K, and default extent threshold is 256K), and for compressed extent it doesn't work at all. So it's better just to remove the rejection, and allow us to defrag physically adjacent extents. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16 Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index 8e1589dd1c70c..212157473ad88 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -1075,10 +1075,6 @@ static bool defrag_check_next_extent(struct inode *inode, struct extent_map *em, */ if (next->len >= get_extent_max_capacity(em)) goto out; - /* Physically adjacent and large enough */ - if ((em->block_start + em->block_len == next->block_start) && - (em->block_len > SZ_128K && next->block_len > SZ_128K)) - goto out; ret = true; out: free_extent_map(next); -- 2.39.5