From e70f14856aef18b4549693686ff9b91aa78e294d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Renninger Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:29:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] [ACPI] fix passive cooling regression Return logic was inverted. Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()). http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410 Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c index f37584015324a..dc9817cfb882a 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c @@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy policy; if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu)) - return -ENODEV; - return 0; + return 0; + return 1; } static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu) -- 2.39.5