From e3876ef2609f8fe68282c44f48b22dcdcb961176 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:32:04 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] hrtimer: Annotate lockless access to timer->base Followup to commit 2e4885debb09 ("hrtimer: Protect lockless access to timer->base") lock_hrtimer_base() fetches timer->base without lock exclusion. Compiler is allowed to read timer->base twice (even if considered dumb) which could end up trying to lock migration_base and return &migration_base. base = timer->base; if (likely(base != &migration_base)) { /* compiler reads timer->base again, and now (base == &migration_base) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&base->cpu_base->lock, *flags); if (likely(base == timer->base)) return base; /* == &migration_base ! */ Similarly the write sides must use WRITE_ONCE() to avoid store tearing. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191008173204.180879-1-edumazet@google.com --- kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c index 0d4dc241c0fb4..65605530ee349 100644 --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ struct hrtimer_clock_base *lock_hrtimer_base(const struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base; for (;;) { - base = timer->base; + base = READ_ONCE(timer->base); if (likely(base != &migration_base)) { raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&base->cpu_base->lock, *flags); if (likely(base == timer->base)) @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ again: return base; /* See the comment in lock_hrtimer_base() */ - timer->base = &migration_base; + WRITE_ONCE(timer->base, &migration_base); raw_spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->lock); raw_spin_lock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock); @@ -253,10 +253,10 @@ again: raw_spin_unlock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock); raw_spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->lock); new_cpu_base = this_cpu_base; - timer->base = base; + WRITE_ONCE(timer->base, base); goto again; } - timer->base = new_base; + WRITE_ONCE(timer->base, new_base); } else { if (new_cpu_base != this_cpu_base && hrtimer_check_target(timer, new_base)) { -- 2.39.5