From ddbb29f8afe2325c8b6fe46158e87c4a7319b38c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:20:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: get better concurrency for snapshot-aware defrag work Using spinning case instead of blocking will result in better concurrency overall. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 13ab4de0a400c..1f26888825e22 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -2312,6 +2312,7 @@ again: key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY; key.offset = start; + path->leave_spinning = 1; if (merge) { struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi; u64 extent_len; @@ -2368,6 +2369,7 @@ again: btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(leaf); inode_add_bytes(inode, len); + btrfs_release_path(path); ret = btrfs_inc_extent_ref(trans, root, new->bytenr, new->disk_len, 0, @@ -2381,6 +2383,7 @@ again: ret = 1; out_free_path: btrfs_release_path(path); + path->leave_spinning = 0; btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root); out_unlock: unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, lock_end, -- 2.39.5