From c1ccdf4f58fc6e384a5d9f74748e3cc979bb31bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joseph Qi Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 21:02:26 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix BUG when iput after ocfs2_mknod fails Commit f19fba12ad86 "ocfs2: should reclaim the inode if '__ocfs2_mknod_locked' returns an error" tried to reclaim the claimed inode if __ocfs2_mknod_locked() fails later. But this introduce a race, the freed bit may be reused immediately by another thread, which will update dinode, e.g. i_generation. Then iput this inode will lead to BUG: inode->i_generation != le32_to_cpu(fe->i_generation) We could make this inode as bad, but we did want to do operations like wipe in some cases. Since the claimed inode bit can only affect that an dinode is missing and will return back after fsck, it seems not a big problem. So just leave it as is by revert the reclaim logic. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221017130227.234480-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com Fixes: f19fba12ad86 ("ocfs2: should reclaim the inode if '__ocfs2_mknod_locked' returns an error") Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi Reported-by: Yan Wang Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 11 +---------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c index 961d1cf54388e..1a97e167b2194 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c @@ -632,18 +632,9 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod_locked(struct ocfs2_super *osb, return status; } - status = __ocfs2_mknod_locked(dir, inode, dev, new_fe_bh, + return __ocfs2_mknod_locked(dir, inode, dev, new_fe_bh, parent_fe_bh, handle, inode_ac, fe_blkno, suballoc_loc, suballoc_bit); - if (status < 0) { - u64 bg_blkno = ocfs2_which_suballoc_group(fe_blkno, suballoc_bit); - int tmp = ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits(handle, inode_ac->ac_inode, - inode_ac->ac_bh, suballoc_bit, bg_blkno, 1); - if (tmp) - mlog_errno(tmp); - } - - return status; } static int ocfs2_mkdir(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, -- 2.39.5