From b9d644b1a4ca000ddbfb993bb6b50c6fa95470d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Burton Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 13:53:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] MIPS: Hang more efficiently on halt/powerdown/restart The generic MIPS implementations of halting, powering down or restarting the system all hang using a busy loop as a last resort. We have many platforms which avoid this loop by implementing their own, many using some variation upon executing a wait instruction to lower CPU power usage if we reach this point. In order to prepare for cleaning up these various custom implementations of the same thing, this patch makes the generic machine_halt(), machine_power_off() & machine_restart() functions each make use of the wait instruction to lower CPU power usage in cases where we know that the wait instruction is available. If wait isn't known to be supported then we fall back to calling cpu_wait(), and if we don't have a cpu_wait() callback then we effectively continue using a busy loop. In effect the new machine_hang() function provides a superset of the functionality that the various platforms currently provide differing subsets of. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/17178/ Signed-off-by: James Hogan --- arch/mips/kernel/reset.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/reset.c b/arch/mips/kernel/reset.c index 7c746d3458e71..6288780b779e7 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/reset.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/reset.c @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ #include #include +#include +#include +#include #include /* @@ -26,6 +29,62 @@ void (*pm_power_off)(void); EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_power_off); +static void machine_hang(void) +{ + /* + * We're hanging the system so we don't want to be interrupted anymore. + * Any interrupt handlers that ran would at best be useless & at worst + * go awry because the system isn't in a functional state. + */ + local_irq_disable(); + + /* + * Mask all interrupts, giving us a better chance of remaining in the + * low power wait state. + */ + clear_c0_status(ST0_IM); + + while (true) { + if (cpu_has_mips_r) { + /* + * We know that the wait instruction is supported so + * make use of it directly, leaving interrupts + * disabled. + */ + asm volatile( + ".set push\n\t" + ".set " MIPS_ISA_ARCH_LEVEL "\n\t" + "wait\n\t" + ".set pop"); + } else if (cpu_wait) { + /* + * Try the cpu_wait() callback. This isn't ideal since + * it'll re-enable interrupts, but that ought to be + * harmless given that they're all masked. + */ + cpu_wait(); + local_irq_disable(); + } else { + /* + * We're going to burn some power running round the + * loop, but we don't really have a choice. This isn't + * a path we should expect to run for long during + * typical use anyway. + */ + } + + /* + * In most modern MIPS CPUs interrupts will cause the wait + * instruction to graduate even when disabled, and in some + * cases even when masked. In order to prevent a timer + * interrupt from continuously taking us out of the low power + * wait state, we clear any pending timer interrupt here. + */ + if (cpu_has_counter) + write_c0_compare(0); + } +} + void machine_restart(char *command) { if (_machine_restart) @@ -38,8 +97,7 @@ void machine_restart(char *command) do_kernel_restart(command); mdelay(1000); pr_emerg("Reboot failed -- System halted\n"); - local_irq_disable(); - while (1); + machine_hang(); } void machine_halt(void) @@ -51,8 +109,7 @@ void machine_halt(void) preempt_disable(); smp_send_stop(); #endif - local_irq_disable(); - while (1); + machine_hang(); } void machine_power_off(void) @@ -64,6 +121,5 @@ void machine_power_off(void) preempt_disable(); smp_send_stop(); #endif - local_irq_disable(); - while (1); + machine_hang(); } -- 2.39.5