From 798e84498b499b19e494b062ece455c6923656b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kyle Huey Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 22:01:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/svm: Account for family 17h event renumberings in amd_pmc_perf_hw_id Zen renumbered some of the performance counters that correspond to the well known events in perf_hw_id. This code in KVM was never updated for that, so guest that attempt to use counters on Zen that correspond to the pre-Zen perf_hw_id values will silently receive the wrong values. This has been observed in the wild with rr[0] when running in Zen 3 guests. rr uses the retired conditional branch counter 00d1 which is incorrectly recognized by KVM as PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND. [0] https://rr-project.org/ Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey Message-Id: <20220503050136.86298-1-khuey@kylehuey.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [Check guest family, not host. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c index 24eb935b6f85c..311cbaa0c3ddf 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c @@ -45,6 +45,22 @@ static struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping amd_event_mapping[] = { [7] = { 0xd1, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND }, }; +/* duplicated from amd_f17h_perfmon_event_map. */ +static struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping amd_f17h_event_mapping[] = { + [0] = { 0x76, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES }, + [1] = { 0xc0, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS }, + [2] = { 0x60, 0xff, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES }, + [3] = { 0x64, 0x09, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES }, + [4] = { 0xc2, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS }, + [5] = { 0xc3, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES }, + [6] = { 0x87, 0x02, PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND }, + [7] = { 0x87, 0x01, PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND }, +}; + +/* amd_pmc_perf_hw_id depends on these being the same size */ +static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(amd_event_mapping) == + ARRAY_SIZE(amd_f17h_event_mapping)); + static unsigned int get_msr_base(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, enum pmu_type type) { struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = pmu_to_vcpu(pmu); @@ -140,6 +156,7 @@ static inline struct kvm_pmc *get_gp_pmc_amd(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u32 msr, static unsigned int amd_pmc_perf_hw_id(struct kvm_pmc *pmc) { + struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping *event_mapping; u8 event_select = pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT; u8 unit_mask = (pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK) >> 8; int i; @@ -148,15 +165,20 @@ static unsigned int amd_pmc_perf_hw_id(struct kvm_pmc *pmc) if (WARN_ON(pmc_is_fixed(pmc))) return PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX; + if (guest_cpuid_family(pmc->vcpu) >= 0x17) + event_mapping = amd_f17h_event_mapping; + else + event_mapping = amd_event_mapping; + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amd_event_mapping); i++) - if (amd_event_mapping[i].eventsel == event_select - && amd_event_mapping[i].unit_mask == unit_mask) + if (event_mapping[i].eventsel == event_select + && event_mapping[i].unit_mask == unit_mask) break; if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(amd_event_mapping)) return PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX; - return amd_event_mapping[i].event_type; + return event_mapping[i].event_type; } /* check if a PMC is enabled by comparing it against global_ctrl bits. Because -- 2.39.5