From 7114aee12e8e0be0fa5e2db25378c000bf7682c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:08:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] dma-buf: Restart reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu() after
writes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In order to be completely generic, we have to double check the read
seqlock after acquiring a reference to the fence. If the driver is
allocating fences from a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, or similar freelist, then
within an RCU grace period a fence may be freed and reallocated. The RCU
read side critical section does not prevent this reallocation, instead
we have to inspect the reservation's seqlock to double check if the
fences have been reassigned as we were acquiring our reference.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829070834.22296-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
---
drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
index 648e5d0325f9f..82de59f7cbbd4 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
@@ -474,12 +474,13 @@ bool reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj,
bool test_all)
{
unsigned seq, shared_count;
- int ret = true;
+ int ret;
+ rcu_read_lock();
retry:
+ ret = true;
shared_count = 0;
seq = read_seqcount_begin(&obj->seq);
- rcu_read_lock();
if (test_all) {
unsigned i;
@@ -490,46 +491,35 @@ retry:
if (fobj)
shared_count = fobj->shared_count;
- if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
- goto unlock_retry;
-
for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) {
struct fence *fence = rcu_dereference(fobj->shared[i]);
ret = reservation_object_test_signaled_single(fence);
if (ret < 0)
- goto unlock_retry;
+ goto retry;
else if (!ret)
break;
}
- /*
- * There could be a read_seqcount_retry here, but nothing cares
- * about whether it's the old or newer fence pointers that are
- * signaled. That race could still have happened after checking
- * read_seqcount_retry. If you care, use ww_mutex_lock.
- */
+ if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
+ goto retry;
}
if (!shared_count) {
struct fence *fence_excl = rcu_dereference(obj->fence_excl);
- if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
- goto unlock_retry;
-
if (fence_excl) {
ret = reservation_object_test_signaled_single(
fence_excl);
if (ret < 0)
- goto unlock_retry;
+ goto retry;
+
+ if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
+ goto retry;
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
-
-unlock_retry:
- rcu_read_unlock();
- goto retry;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu);
--
2.39.5