From 1bd4403d86a1c06cb6cc9ac87664a0c9d3413d51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:02:01 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] unsafe_[get|put]_user: change interface to use a error target label When I initially added the unsafe_[get|put]_user() helpers in commit 5b24a7a2aa20 ("Add 'unsafe' user access functions for batched accesses"), I made the mistake of modeling the interface on our traditional __[get|put]_user() functions, which return zero on success, or -EFAULT on failure. That interface is fairly easy to use, but it's actually fairly nasty for good code generation, since it essentially forces the caller to check the error value for each access. In particular, since the error handling is already internally implemented with an exception handler, and we already use "asm goto" for various other things, we could fairly easily make the error cases just jump directly to an error label instead, and avoid the need for explicit checking after each operation. So switch the interface to pass in an error label, rather than checking the error value in the caller. Best do it now before we start growing more users (the signal handling code in particular would be a good place to use the new interface). So rather than if (unsafe_get_user(x, ptr)) ... handle error .. the interface is now unsafe_get_user(x, ptr, label); where an error during the user mode fetch will now just cause a jump to 'label' in the caller. Right now the actual _implementation_ of this all still ends up being a "if (err) goto label", and does not take advantage of any exception label tricks, but for "unsafe_put_user()" in particular it should be fairly straightforward to convert to using the exception table model. Note that "unsafe_get_user()" is much harder to convert to a clever exception table model, because current versions of gcc do not allow the use of "asm goto" (for the exception) with output values (for the actual value to be fetched). But that is hopefully not a limitation in the long term. [ Also note that it might be a good idea to switch unsafe_get_user() to actually _return_ the value it fetches from user space, but this commit only changes the error handling semantics ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 16 ++++++++-------- include/linux/uaccess.h | 4 ++-- lib/strncpy_from_user.c | 8 ++++---- lib/strnlen_user.c | 7 +++---- 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index c03bfb68c5035..52f230094c51a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -812,21 +812,21 @@ copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) #define user_access_begin() __uaccess_begin() #define user_access_end() __uaccess_end() -#define unsafe_put_user(x, ptr) \ -({ \ +#define unsafe_put_user(x, ptr, err_label) \ +do { \ int __pu_err; \ __put_user_size((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)), __pu_err, -EFAULT); \ - __builtin_expect(__pu_err, 0); \ -}) + if (unlikely(__pu_err)) goto err_label; \ +} while (0) -#define unsafe_get_user(x, ptr) \ -({ \ +#define unsafe_get_user(x, ptr, err_label) \ +do { \ int __gu_err; \ unsigned long __gu_val; \ __get_user_size(__gu_val, (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)), __gu_err, -EFAULT); \ (x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \ - __builtin_expect(__gu_err, 0); \ -}) + if (unlikely(__gu_err)) goto err_label; \ +} while (0) #endif /* _ASM_X86_UACCESS_H */ diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h index 349557825428e..f30c187ed7853 100644 --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h @@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ extern long strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr, long count); #ifndef user_access_begin #define user_access_begin() do { } while (0) #define user_access_end() do { } while (0) -#define unsafe_get_user(x, ptr) __get_user(x, ptr) -#define unsafe_put_user(x, ptr) __put_user(x, ptr) +#define unsafe_get_user(x, ptr, err) do { if (unlikely(__get_user(x, ptr))) goto err; } while (0) +#define unsafe_put_user(x, ptr, err) do { if (unlikely(__put_user(x, ptr))) goto err; } while (0) #endif #endif /* __LINUX_UACCESS_H__ */ diff --git a/lib/strncpy_from_user.c b/lib/strncpy_from_user.c index 33f655ef48cd1..9c5fe81104135 100644 --- a/lib/strncpy_from_user.c +++ b/lib/strncpy_from_user.c @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src, long unsigned long c, data; /* Fall back to byte-at-a-time if we get a page fault */ - if (unlikely(unsafe_get_user(c,(unsigned long __user *)(src+res)))) - break; + unsafe_get_user(c, (unsigned long __user *)(src+res), byte_at_a_time); + *(unsigned long *)(dst+res) = c; if (has_zero(c, &data, &constants)) { data = prep_zero_mask(c, data, &constants); @@ -56,8 +56,7 @@ byte_at_a_time: while (max) { char c; - if (unlikely(unsafe_get_user(c,src+res))) - return -EFAULT; + unsafe_get_user(c,src+res, efault); dst[res] = c; if (!c) return res; @@ -76,6 +75,7 @@ byte_at_a_time: * Nope: we hit the address space limit, and we still had more * characters the caller would have wanted. That's an EFAULT. */ +efault: return -EFAULT; } diff --git a/lib/strnlen_user.c b/lib/strnlen_user.c index 2625943625d7f..8e105ed4df12b 100644 --- a/lib/strnlen_user.c +++ b/lib/strnlen_user.c @@ -45,8 +45,7 @@ static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count, src -= align; max += align; - if (unlikely(unsafe_get_user(c,(unsigned long __user *)src))) - return 0; + unsafe_get_user(c, (unsigned long __user *)src, efault); c |= aligned_byte_mask(align); for (;;) { @@ -61,8 +60,7 @@ static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count, if (unlikely(max <= sizeof(unsigned long))) break; max -= sizeof(unsigned long); - if (unlikely(unsafe_get_user(c,(unsigned long __user *)(src+res)))) - return 0; + unsafe_get_user(c, (unsigned long __user *)(src+res), efault); } res -= align; @@ -77,6 +75,7 @@ static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count, * Nope: we hit the address space limit, and we still had more * characters the caller would have wanted. That's 0. */ +efault: return 0; } -- 2.39.5