From 1ac5c74eec411eb4ac8d717aef78441f5e3b6b71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ross Zwisler Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 17:02:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] radix-tree: add test for radix_tree_locate_item() Add a unit test that provides coverage for the bug fixed in the commit entitled "radix-tree: rewrite radix_tree_locate_item fix" from Hugh Dickins. I've verified that this test fails before his patch due to miscalculated 'index' values in __locate() in lib/radix-tree.c, and passes with his fix. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462307263-20623-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler Cc: Hugh Dickins Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/init.h | 1 + tools/testing/radix-tree/main.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/init.h diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/init.h b/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/init.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..360cabb3c4e76 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/init.h @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +/* An empty file stub that allows radix-tree.c to compile. */ diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/main.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/main.c index 65231e9ba3e82..b7619ff3b552b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/main.c +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/main.c @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ void copy_tag_check(void) item_kill_tree(&tree); } -void __locate_check(struct radix_tree_root *tree, unsigned long index, +static void __locate_check(struct radix_tree_root *tree, unsigned long index, unsigned order) { struct item *item; @@ -248,12 +248,25 @@ void __locate_check(struct radix_tree_root *tree, unsigned long index, } } +static void __order_0_locate_check(void) +{ + RADIX_TREE(tree, GFP_KERNEL); + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < 50; i++) + __locate_check(&tree, rand() % INT_MAX, 0); + + item_kill_tree(&tree); +} + static void locate_check(void) { RADIX_TREE(tree, GFP_KERNEL); unsigned order; unsigned long offset, index; + __order_0_locate_check(); + for (order = 0; order < 20; order++) { for (offset = 0; offset < (1 << (order + 3)); offset += (1UL << order)) { -- 2.39.5