From 05da70a4fae167ffcc54998de66ee0a80047fbcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Deucher Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:59:41 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: gcc fixes for sumo dpm Newer versions of gcc seem to wander off into the weeds when dealing with variable sizes arrays in structs. Rather than indexing the arrays, use pointer arithmetic. See bugs: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66932 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66972 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66945 Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sumo_dpm.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sumo_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sumo_dpm.c index 2cefe59ef5866..864761c0120ec 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sumo_dpm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sumo_dpm.c @@ -1483,6 +1483,7 @@ static int sumo_parse_power_table(struct radeon_device *rdev) rdev->pm.dpm.backbias_response_time = le16_to_cpu(power_info->pplib.usBackbiasTime); rdev->pm.dpm.voltage_response_time = le16_to_cpu(power_info->pplib.usVoltageTime); for (i = 0; i < state_array->ucNumEntries; i++) { + u8 *idx; power_state = (union pplib_power_state *)power_state_offset; non_clock_array_index = power_state->v2.nonClockInfoIndex; non_clock_info = (struct _ATOM_PPLIB_NONCLOCK_INFO *) @@ -1496,12 +1497,15 @@ static int sumo_parse_power_table(struct radeon_device *rdev) } rdev->pm.dpm.ps[i].ps_priv = ps; k = 0; + idx = (u8 *)&power_state->v2.clockInfoIndex[0]; for (j = 0; j < power_state->v2.ucNumDPMLevels; j++) { - clock_array_index = power_state->v2.clockInfoIndex[j]; + clock_array_index = idx[j]; if (k >= SUMO_MAX_HARDWARE_POWERLEVELS) break; + clock_info = (union pplib_clock_info *) - &clock_info_array->clockInfo[clock_array_index * clock_info_array->ucEntrySize]; + ((u8 *)&clock_info_array->clockInfo[0] + + (clock_array_index * clock_info_array->ucEntrySize)); sumo_parse_pplib_clock_info(rdev, &rdev->pm.dpm.ps[i], k, clock_info); -- 2.39.5