From 017aa3c92342a92cdfea651f336ac52bd1bd94c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tuong Lien Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 09:18:15 +0700 Subject: [PATCH] tipc: fix link overflow issue at socket shutdown When a socket is suddenly shutdown or released, it will reject all the unreceived messages in its receive queue. This applies to a connected socket too, whereas there is only one 'FIN' message required to be sent back to its peer in this case. In case there are many messages in the queue and/or some connections with such messages are shutdown at the same time, the link layer will easily get overflowed at the 'TIPC_SYSTEM_IMPORTANCE' backlog level because of the message rejections. As a result, the link will be taken down. Moreover, immediately when the link is re-established, the socket layer can continue to reject the messages and the same issue happens... The commit refactors the '__tipc_shutdown()' function to only send one 'FIN' in the situation mentioned above. For the connectionless case, it is unavoidable but usually there is no rejections for such socket messages because they are 'dest-droppable' by default. In addition, the new code makes the other socket states clear (e.g.'TIPC_LISTEN') and treats as a separate case to avoid misbehaving. Acked-by: Ying Xue Acked-by: Jon Maloy Signed-off-by: Tuong Lien Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/tipc/socket.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c index 6552f986774ca..6ebd809ef207d 100644 --- a/net/tipc/socket.c +++ b/net/tipc/socket.c @@ -287,12 +287,12 @@ static void tipc_sk_respond(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int err) * * Caller must hold socket lock */ -static void tsk_rej_rx_queue(struct sock *sk) +static void tsk_rej_rx_queue(struct sock *sk, int error) { struct sk_buff *skb; while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue))) - tipc_sk_respond(sk, skb, TIPC_ERR_NO_PORT); + tipc_sk_respond(sk, skb, error); } static bool tipc_sk_connected(struct sock *sk) @@ -545,34 +545,45 @@ static void __tipc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int error) /* Remove pending SYN */ __skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_write_queue); - /* Reject all unreceived messages, except on an active connection - * (which disconnects locally & sends a 'FIN+' to peer). - */ - while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) { - if (TIPC_SKB_CB(skb)->bytes_read) { - kfree_skb(skb); - continue; - } - if (!tipc_sk_type_connectionless(sk) && - sk->sk_state != TIPC_DISCONNECTING) { - tipc_set_sk_state(sk, TIPC_DISCONNECTING); - tipc_node_remove_conn(net, dnode, tsk->portid); - } - tipc_sk_respond(sk, skb, error); + /* Remove partially received buffer if any */ + skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + if (skb && TIPC_SKB_CB(skb)->bytes_read) { + __skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue); + kfree_skb(skb); } - if (tipc_sk_type_connectionless(sk)) + /* Reject all unreceived messages if connectionless */ + if (tipc_sk_type_connectionless(sk)) { + tsk_rej_rx_queue(sk, error); return; + } - if (sk->sk_state != TIPC_DISCONNECTING) { + switch (sk->sk_state) { + case TIPC_CONNECTING: + case TIPC_ESTABLISHED: + tipc_set_sk_state(sk, TIPC_DISCONNECTING); + tipc_node_remove_conn(net, dnode, tsk->portid); + /* Send a FIN+/- to its peer */ + skb = __skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + if (skb) { + __skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + tipc_sk_respond(sk, skb, error); + break; + } skb = tipc_msg_create(TIPC_CRITICAL_IMPORTANCE, TIPC_CONN_MSG, SHORT_H_SIZE, 0, dnode, tsk_own_node(tsk), tsk_peer_port(tsk), tsk->portid, error); if (skb) tipc_node_xmit_skb(net, skb, dnode, tsk->portid); - tipc_node_remove_conn(net, dnode, tsk->portid); - tipc_set_sk_state(sk, TIPC_DISCONNECTING); + break; + case TIPC_LISTEN: + /* Reject all SYN messages */ + tsk_rej_rx_queue(sk, error); + break; + default: + __skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + break; } } @@ -2643,7 +2654,7 @@ static int tipc_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *new_sock, int flags, * Reject any stray messages received by new socket * before the socket lock was taken (very, very unlikely) */ - tsk_rej_rx_queue(new_sk); + tsk_rej_rx_queue(new_sk, TIPC_ERR_NO_PORT); /* Connect new socket to it's peer */ tipc_sk_finish_conn(new_tsock, msg_origport(msg), msg_orignode(msg)); -- 2.39.5