Colin Ian King [Fri, 5 Jul 2019 07:53:03 +0000 (08:53 +0100)]
ASoC: rt5665: remove redundant assignment to variable idx
The variable idx is being initialized with a value that is never
read and it is being updated later with a new value. The
initialization is redundant and can be removed.
ASoC: core: Return -ENOTSUPP from set_channel_map() if no operation provided
It makes it easier for common code to work with snd_soc_dai_set_channel_map()
by distinguishing between operation not being supported and an error.
This is done inline with others snd_soc_dai.* apis.
Add the optional reset line handling which is present on the new SoC
families, such as the g12a. Triggering this reset is not critical but
it helps solve a channel shift issue on the g12a.
Mac Chiang [Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:18:33 +0000 (18:18 +0800)]
ASoC: max98357a: avoid speaker pop when playback startup
Loud speaker pop happens during playback even when in slience
playback. Specify Max98357a amp delay times to make sure
clocks are always earlier than sdmode on.
Signed-off-by: Mac Chiang <mac.chiang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit ad1d4b8a2026 ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 3c92e9898ef4 ("ASoC: qcom: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 2f86757f723c ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit de3efeb3a8d3 ("ASoC: ux500: mop500: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 5b8d146c2a2b ("ASoC: ti: rx51: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit d55bb759d233 ("ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 84ec8f1d155a ("ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit a860f7f30ae0 ("ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit fe2f6d0e937c ("ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 4d926ea20e5b ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 017ad8f19ec6 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 7ceefd5e24dc ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 91f8e3e31934 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit f396a7e13dce ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 2fa07081dd6d ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 8d5eb491c66f ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 3342e96f4395 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit c334e790373b ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit f426274ea45b ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 2be3cd7e1adb ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 893a69208e06 ("ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit d47c44150441 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 0ef7c99a4f96 ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit a10a13d54090 ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 5dbd95eafe8a ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit d190189edc20 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 98f162bab7ce ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 0120522d80a6 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 6af491b402d9 ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 607f9b6c689a ("ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 92ff2acbcb5c ("ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 8d13c97f7ea5e ("ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit cf96b2286bed2 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 6c6aa4a00321 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 326a9873df72 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 7e8d7c8c84b67b ("ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 03347dba3a5987 ("ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 53839f0e57487 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit acd112fd5589 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 451807bbddde798 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 99bddb211b5c81 ("ASoC: atmel: mikroe-proto: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 17d48b28e1fb3ecc ("ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit b069ca73a4af43d ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 983096b0fa635 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit c28139141d76b ("ASoC: vc4: vc4_hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Colin Ian King [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:32:08 +0000 (14:32 +0100)]
ASoC: topology: fix memory leaks on sm, se and sbe
Currently when a kstrdup fails the error exit paths don't free
the allocations for sm, se and sbe. This can be fixed by assigning
kc[i].private_value to these before doing the ksrtdup so that the error
exit path will be able to free these objects.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak") Fixes: 04095d187ee8 ("ASoC: topology: Consolidate and fix asoc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create flow") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Jerome Brunet [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:17:08 +0000 (10:17 +0200)]
ASoC: meson: axg-card: remove useless check on codec
While checking cpus before dereferencing the pointer is required, it is
not necessary for codecs. 'codec' can't possibly be NULL in the loop
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Jerome Brunet [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:13:50 +0000 (14:13 +0200)]
ASoC: soc-core: support dai_link with platforms_num != 1
Add support platforms_num != 1 in dai_link. Initially, the main purpose of
this change was to make the platform optional in the dai_link, instead of
inserting the dummy platform driver.
This particular case had just been solved by Kuninori Morimoto with
commit 4492fea931ad ("ASoC: soc-core: allow no Platform on dai_link").
However, this change may still be useful for those who need multiple
platform components on a single dai_link (it solves one of the FIXME
note in soc-core)
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: soc-core: don't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()
commit 9a11f40de525f ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at
snd_soc_find_dai()") used soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai(),
but, some CPU driver has CPU component for DAI and Platform component,
for example generic DMAEngine component.
In such case, CPU component and Platform component have same
of_node / name.
Here soc_find_component() returns *1st* found component.
Thus, we shouldn't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai().
This patch fixup this it, and add comment to indicate this limitation.
Fixes: commit 9a11f40de525f ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()") Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
R-Car Sound can use pin sharing and multi-SSI for
SSI0/1/2/3/4/9.
Because complex HW settings and spaghetti code,
the settings for SSI9 pin sharing with SSI0 doesn't work.
This patch tidyup settings for it.
Reported-by: Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Tested-by: Chaoliang Qin <chaoliang.qin.jg@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Charles Keepax [Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:37:27 +0000 (16:37 +0100)]
ASoC: madera: Update SPDX headers
The madera driver was merged too late to catch Thomas Gleixner's cleanup
of the SPDX headers tree wide. Update the headers to match what was done
in that patch.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kamil Lulko [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:04:36 +0000 (21:04 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Strip T and L from TLV IPCs
cAVS modules do not require Type and Length header within the
set_module_params IPC. This is also true for Vendor modules. The
userspace (like tinymix) always appends this header to TLV controls
which are used for set_module_params. Simply assume this header is
always present in the payload and omit it from the IPC.
Signed-off-by: Kamil Lulko <kamilx.lulko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Reset pipeline before its deletion
Before actual deletion, pipeline should enter RESET state. Currently,
pipe skips this checkpoint and goes straight to the finish line.
This is not the expected path by the FW, so correct it.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cezary Rojewski [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:04:34 +0000 (21:04 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Common: Fix NULL dereference in tx_wait_done
rx_data and rx_bytes present for tx_wait_done are optional parameters.
If not provided, function should not attempt to copy received data.
This change fixes memcpy NULL pointer dereference issue occurring when
optional rx_data is NULL while received message size is non-zero.
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Since there are multiple IPCs being sent in a short span of time, there
is a possibility of more than one message being on the Rx list after
receiving response from firmware. In such cases, when the first
notification of interrupt from firmware is received, driver retrieves
the message from the Rx list but does not delete it from the list till
the next lock. In the meantime, when another interrupt is received from
the firmware, driver is reading the previous message again since the
previous message has not been removed from the list.
Signed-off-by: Gustaw Lewandowski <gustaw.lewandowski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cezary Rojewski [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:04:32 +0000 (21:04 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Read HIPCT extension before clearing DONE bit
Host clears DONE bit to signal IPC target it has completed the
operation. Once this is done, IPC target i.e. DSP may proceed with the
next reply, filling registers with new portion of data.
Because of this, host should always read all registers prior to clearing
DONE and BUSY bits to ensure no desynchronization happens the time in
between clearing bits and reading message data (here, extension).
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: topology: Consolidate and fix asoc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create flow
There are a few soc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create functions with similar
content, but slightly different flow, unify their flow and make sure
that we go to error handler and free memory in case of failure.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: topology: Consolidate how dtexts and dvalues are freed
Provide helper functions and use them to free dtexts and dvalues in
topology. This is followup cleanup after related changes in this area as
suggested in:
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-January/144761.html
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When we unload Skylake driver we may end up calling
hdac_component_master_unbind(), it uses acomp->audio_ops, which we set
in hdmi_codec_probe(), so we need to set it to NULL in hdmi_codec_remove(),
otherwise we will dereference no longer existing pointer.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Fix NULL ptr dereference when unloading clk dev
When driver is probed, we iterate over NHLT and check if clk entries are
present. For each such entry we call register_skl_clk and keep the
result in data->clk[].
Currently data->clk is sparsely indexed using NHLT table iterator, while
when freeing we use number of registered entries. Let's just use
data->avail_clk_cnt as index, so it can be reset back in
unregister_src_clk.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Don't return failure on machine driver reload
When we unload and reload machine driver, we shouldn't return that we
failed to initialize. This allows to reload machine driver, without
having to unload whole stack.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ALSA: hdac: Fix codec name after machine driver is unloaded and reloaded
Currently on each driver reload internal counter is being increased. It
causes failure to enumerate driver devices, as they have hardcoded:
.codec_name = "ehdaudio0D2",
As there is currently no devices with multiple hda codecs and there is
currently no established way to reliably differentiate, between them,
always assign bus->idx = 0;
This fixes a problem when we unload and reload machine driver idx gets
incremented, so .codec_name would've needed to be set to "ehdaudio1D2"
after first reload and so on.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Initialize lists before access so they are safe to use
If skl_probe_work() was not run driver ends up dereferencing NULL
pointer when operating on lists in skl_platform_unregister().
To fix this initialize lists in skl_create(). Also run
cancel_work_sync() before all cleanup functions, so we don't end up
unnecessarily running probe work.
Easily reproducible with:
while true; do modprobe snd_soc_skl; rmmod snd_soc_skl; done
(with the assumption that relevant drivers are added to blacklist on
system boot)
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Use recommended SDxFMT programming sequence
For BXT platforms, the recommended sequence to program the SDxFMT is to
first couple the stream, write the format and decouple again.
For all other platforms said sequence remains unchanged.
To prevent code duplication, IS_BXT (and consequently IS_CFL) macro is
relocated to hda_codec.h file so it can be accessed by SKL driver.
Signed-off-by: Paweł Harłoziński <pawel.harlozinski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Curtis Malainey [Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:52:39 +0000 (13:52 -0700)]
ASoC: rt5677: depop stereo dac
Upon enabling the ASRC DAC we need a delay to avoid popping the
speakers.
Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org> Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@chromium.org> Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: rk3399_gru_sound: Support 32, 44.1 and 88.2 kHz sample rates
According to the datasheet the max98357a also supports 32, 44.1 and
88.2 kHz sample rate. This support was also introduced recently by
commit f59be8d8ed56 ("ASoC: max98357a: add missing supported rates").
Actually the machine driver validates the supported sample rates but
this is not really needed because the component driver can all apply
whatever constraints are needed and do their own validation. So, remove
the checks from the machine driver as are not needed at all. This way,
we also support 32, 44.1 and 88.2 kHz sample rates and we get rid of the
errors like the below.
rk3399-gru-sound sound: rockchip_sound_max98357a_hw_params() doesn't support this sample rate: 44100
rk3399-gru-sound sound: ASoC: machine hw_params failed: -22
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
soc_find_component() is using "of_node" and "name" to finding component,
but we should use snd_soc_dai_link_component now, because it is created
to such purpose.
This patch uses snd_soc_dai_link_component for soc_find_component().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ALSA SoC already has snd_soc_is_matching_component() to confirming
matching component, but, soc_find_component() has original
implementation to confirm component.
We shouldn't have duplicate implementation to do same things.
This patch uses snd_soc_is_matching_component() at soc_find_component()
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
projects / kernel.git / log