From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:09:03 +0000 (-0400) Subject: KVM: x86: do not report a vCPU as preempted outside instruction boundaries X-Git-Tag: baikal/aarch64/sdk6.1~3770^2 X-Git-Url: https://git.baikalelectronics.ru/sdk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6d439323e4ba0d420c1b3d7030de9f750d88e8da;p=kernel.git KVM: x86: do not report a vCPU as preempted outside instruction boundaries If a vCPU is outside guest mode and is scheduled out, it might be in the process of making a memory access. A problem occurs if another vCPU uses the PV TLB flush feature during the period when the vCPU is scheduled out, and a virtual address has already been translated but has not yet been accessed, because this is equivalent to using a stale TLB entry. To avoid this, only report a vCPU as preempted if sure that the guest is at an instruction boundary. A rescheduling request will be delivered to the host physical CPU as an external interrupt, so for simplicity consider any vmexit *not* instruction boundary except for external interrupts. It would in principle be okay to report the vCPU as preempted also if it is sleeping in kvm_vcpu_block(): a TLB flush IPI will incur the vmentry/vmexit overhead unnecessarily, and optimistic spinning is also unlikely to succeed. However, leave it for later because right now kvm_vcpu_check_block() is doing memory accesses. Even though the TLB flush issue only applies to virtual memory address, it's very much preferrable to be conservative. Reported-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 959d66b9be94d..3a240a64ac68f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { u64 ia32_misc_enable_msr; u64 smbase; u64 smi_count; + bool at_instruction_boundary; bool tpr_access_reporting; bool xsaves_enabled; bool xfd_no_write_intercept; @@ -1300,6 +1301,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat { u64 nested_run; u64 directed_yield_attempted; u64 directed_yield_successful; + u64 preemption_reported; + u64 preemption_other; u64 guest_mode; }; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c index 478e6ee81d883..921fcb85a9cdb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c @@ -4263,6 +4263,8 @@ out: static void svm_handle_exit_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { + if (to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_INTR) + vcpu->arch.at_instruction_boundary = true; } static void svm_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index f5aeade623d61..14e01178a753c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -6547,6 +6547,7 @@ static void handle_external_interrupt_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return; handle_interrupt_nmi_irqoff(vcpu, gate_offset(desc)); + vcpu->arch.at_instruction_boundary = true; } static void vmx_handle_exit_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index a8bb635cb76b2..25a517206c4d3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vcpu_stats_desc[] = { STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, nested_run), STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, directed_yield_attempted), STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, directed_yield_successful), + STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, preemption_reported), + STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, preemption_other), STATS_DESC_ICOUNTER(VCPU, guest_mode) }; @@ -4625,6 +4627,19 @@ static void kvm_steal_time_set_preempted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct kvm_memslots *slots; static const u8 preempted = KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED; + /* + * The vCPU can be marked preempted if and only if the VM-Exit was on + * an instruction boundary and will not trigger guest emulation of any + * kind (see vcpu_run). Vendor specific code controls (conservatively) + * when this is true, for example allowing the vCPU to be marked + * preempted if and only if the VM-Exit was due to a host interrupt. + */ + if (!vcpu->arch.at_instruction_boundary) { + vcpu->stat.preemption_other++; + return; + } + + vcpu->stat.preemption_reported++; if (!(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED)) return; @@ -10424,6 +10439,13 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.l1tf_flush_l1d = true; for (;;) { + /* + * If another guest vCPU requests a PV TLB flush in the middle + * of instruction emulation, the rest of the emulation could + * use a stale page translation. Assume that any code after + * this point can start executing an instruction. + */ + vcpu->arch.at_instruction_boundary = false; if (kvm_vcpu_running(vcpu)) { r = vcpu_enter_guest(vcpu); } else {