return min(source_max, sink_max);
}
-/*
- * The units on the numbers in the next two are... bizarre. Examples will
- * make it clearer; this one parallels an example in the eDP spec.
- *
- * intel_dp_max_data_rate for one lane of 2.7GHz evaluates as:
- *
- * 270000 * 1 * 8 / 10 == 216000
- *
- * The actual data capacity of that configuration is 2.16Gbit/s, so the
- * units are decakilobits. ->clock in a drm_display_mode is in kilohertz -
- * or equivalently, kilopixels per second - so for 1680x1050R it'd be
- * 119000. At 18bpp that's 2142000 kilobits per second.
- *
- * Thus the strange-looking division by 10 in intel_dp_link_required, to
- * get the result in decakilobits instead of kilobits.
- */
-
static int
intel_dp_link_required(int pixel_clock, int bpp)
{
- return (pixel_clock * bpp + 9) / 10;
+ /* pixel_clock is in kHz, divide bpp by 8 for bit to Byte conversion */
+ return DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_clock * bpp, 8);
}
static int
intel_dp_max_data_rate(int max_link_clock, int max_lanes)
{
- return (max_link_clock * max_lanes * 8) / 10;
+ /* max_link_clock is the link symbol clock (LS_Clk) in kHz and not the
+ * link rate that is generally expressed in Gbps. Since, 8 bits of data
+ * is transmitted every LS_Clk per lane, there is no need to account for
+ * the channel encoding that is done in the PHY layer here.
+ */
+
+ return max_link_clock * max_lanes;
}
static int
if (val == 0)
break;
- /* Value read is in kHz while drm clock is saved in deca-kHz */
+ /* Value read multiplied by 200kHz gives the per-lane
+ * link rate in kHz. The source rates are, however,
+ * stored in terms of LS_Clk kHz. The full conversion
+ * back to symbols is
+ * (val * 200kHz)*(8/10 ch. encoding)*(1/8 bit to Byte)
+ */
intel_dp->sink_rates[i] = (val * 200) / 10;
}
intel_dp->num_sink_rates = i;