In theory these are orthogonal, but in practice all NUMA systems are
SMP. NUMA && !SMP doesn't build, everyone else is coupling them, and I
don't really see any value in supporting that configuration.
Fixes: 4f0e8eef772e ("riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform")
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Suggested-by: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
Reported-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
# Common NUMA Features
config NUMA
bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
+ depends on SMP
select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
select OF_NUMA
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING