Commit
ec4bfdd8176a ("ipv6: Don't reduce hop limit for an interface")
disabled accept hop limit from RA if it is smaller than the current hop
limit for security stuff. But this behavior kind of break the RFC definition.
RFC 4861, 6.3.4. Processing Received Router Advertisements
A Router Advertisement field (e.g., Cur Hop Limit, Reachable Time,
and Retrans Timer) may contain a value denoting that it is
unspecified. In such cases, the parameter should be ignored and the
host should continue using whatever value it is already using.
If the received Cur Hop Limit value is non-zero, the host SHOULD set
its CurHopLimit variable to the received value.
So add sysctl option accept_ra_min_hop_limit to let user choose the minimum
hop limit value they can accept from RA. And set default to 1 to meet RFC
standards.
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@miraclelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
disabled if accept_ra_from_local is disabled
on a specific interface.
+accept_ra_min_hop_limit - INTEGER
+ Minimum hop limit Information in Router Advertisement.
+
+ Hop limit Information in Router Advertisement less than this
+ variable shall be ignored.
+
+ Default: 1
+
accept_ra_pinfo - BOOLEAN
Learn Prefix Information in Router Advertisement.
__s32 max_desync_factor;
__s32 max_addresses;
__s32 accept_ra_defrtr;
+ __s32 accept_ra_min_hop_limit;
__s32 accept_ra_pinfo;
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
__s32 accept_ra_rtr_pref;
DEVCONF_ACCEPT_RA_MTU,
DEVCONF_STABLE_SECRET,
DEVCONF_USE_OIF_ADDRS_ONLY,
+ DEVCONF_ACCEPT_RA_MIN_HOP_LIMIT,
DEVCONF_MAX
};
.max_addresses = IPV6_MAX_ADDRESSES,
.accept_ra_defrtr = 1,
.accept_ra_from_local = 0,
+ .accept_ra_min_hop_limit= 1,
.accept_ra_pinfo = 1,
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
.accept_ra_rtr_pref = 1,
.max_addresses = IPV6_MAX_ADDRESSES,
.accept_ra_defrtr = 1,
.accept_ra_from_local = 0,
+ .accept_ra_min_hop_limit= 1,
.accept_ra_pinfo = 1,
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
.accept_ra_rtr_pref = 1,
array[DEVCONF_MAX_DESYNC_FACTOR] = cnf->max_desync_factor;
array[DEVCONF_MAX_ADDRESSES] = cnf->max_addresses;
array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_RA_DEFRTR] = cnf->accept_ra_defrtr;
+ array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_RA_MIN_HOP_LIMIT] = cnf->accept_ra_min_hop_limit;
array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_RA_PINFO] = cnf->accept_ra_pinfo;
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_RA_RTR_PREF] = cnf->accept_ra_rtr_pref;
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
},
+ {
+ .procname = "accept_ra_min_hop_limit",
+ .data = &ipv6_devconf.accept_ra_min_hop_limit,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ },
{
.procname = "accept_ra_pinfo",
.data = &ipv6_devconf.accept_ra_pinfo,
if (rt)
rt6_set_expires(rt, jiffies + (HZ * lifetime));
- if (ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit) {
- /* Only set hop_limit on the interface if it is higher than
- * the current hop_limit.
- */
- if (in6_dev->cnf.hop_limit < ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit) {
+ if (in6_dev->cnf.accept_ra_min_hop_limit < 256 &&
+ ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit) {
+ if (in6_dev->cnf.accept_ra_min_hop_limit <= ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit) {
in6_dev->cnf.hop_limit = ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit;
+ if (rt)
+ dst_metric_set(&rt->dst, RTAX_HOPLIMIT,
+ ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit);
} else {
- ND_PRINTK(2, warn, "RA: Got route advertisement with lower hop_limit than current\n");
+ ND_PRINTK(2, warn, "RA: Got route advertisement with lower hop_limit than minimum\n");
}
- if (rt)
- dst_metric_set(&rt->dst, RTAX_HOPLIMIT,
- ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_hop_limit);
}
skip_defrtr: