This was unusual; normally, inline functions are declared static as
well, and defined in a header file if used by multiple compilation
units. The latter would be more involved in this case, so just drop
the inline declaration for now.
Fixes compile failure building for ppc64le on RHEL 8:
In file included from ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h:32,
from ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:33:
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c: In function ‘amdgpu_ras_recovery_init’:
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.h:90:17: error: inlining failed in call
to ‘always_inline’ ‘amdgpu_ras_eeprom_max_record_count’: function body not available
90 | inline uint32_t amdgpu_ras_eeprom_max_record_count(void);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:1985:34: note: called from here
1985 | max_eeprom_records_len = amdgpu_ras_eeprom_max_record_count();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fixes: 53231ee6dce0 "drm/amdgpu: validate bad page threshold in ras(v3)"
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
return res;
}
-inline uint32_t amdgpu_ras_eeprom_max_record_count(void)
+uint32_t amdgpu_ras_eeprom_max_record_count(void)
{
return RAS_MAX_RECORD_COUNT;
}
int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_append(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
struct eeprom_table_record *records, const u32 num);
-inline uint32_t amdgpu_ras_eeprom_max_record_count(void);
+uint32_t amdgpu_ras_eeprom_max_record_count(void);
void amdgpu_ras_debugfs_set_ret_size(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control);