[ Upstream commit
1357e263df023083e7eac5666360c4ddc8df12de ]
When vdosys1 was initially added, it was incorrectly assumed to be
compatible with vdosys0, and thus both had the same mt8195-mmsys
compatible attached.
This has since been corrected in commit
664c7734ec53 ("dt-bindings:
arm: mediatek: mmsys: change compatible for MT8195") and commit
ba0e814afac9 ("dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add vdosys1 compatible
for MT8195"). The device tree needs to be fixed as well, otherwise
the vdosys1 block fails to work, and causes its dependent power domain
controller to not work either.
Change the compatible string of vdosys1 to "mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1".
While at it, also add the new "mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0" compatible to
vdosys0.
Fixes: 6433ab7781a3 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230202104014.2931517-1-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
};
vdosys0: syscon@1c01a000 {
- compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys", "syscon";
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0", "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys", "syscon";
reg = <0 0x1c01a000 0 0x1000>;
mboxes = <&gce0 0 CMDQ_THR_PRIO_4>;
#clock-cells = <1>;
};
vdosys1: syscon@1c100000 {
- compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys", "syscon";
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1", "syscon";
reg = <0 0x1c100000 0 0x1000>;
#clock-cells = <1>;
};