netpoll: do not test NAPI_STATE_SCHED in poll_one_napi()

Since we do no longer require NAPI drivers to provide
an ndo_poll_controller(), napi_schedule() has not been done
before poll_one_napi() invocation.

So testing NAPI_STATE_SCHED is likely to cause early returns.

While we are at it, remove outdated comment.

Note to future bisections : This change might surface prior
bugs in drivers. See commit 11fd10c2373a ("bnxt_en: Fix TX
timeout during netpoll.") for one occurrence.

Fixes: 12b3c16a7c5b ("netpoll: make ndo_poll_controller() optional")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Tested-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index 3219a2932463096566ce8ff336ecdf699422dd65..3ae899805f8b674b4ffb7d791330f836d38eff7d 100644 (file)
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -135,27 +135,9 @@ static void queue_process(struct work_struct *work)
        }
 }
 
-/*
- * Check whether delayed processing was scheduled for our NIC. If so,
- * we attempt to grab the poll lock and use ->poll() to pump the card.
- * If this fails, either we've recursed in ->poll() or it's already
- * running on another CPU.
- *
- * Note: we don't mask interrupts with this lock because we're using
- * trylock here and interrupts are already disabled in the softirq
- * case. Further, we test the poll_owner to avoid recursion on UP
- * systems where the lock doesn't exist.
- */
 static void poll_one_napi(struct napi_struct *napi)
 {
-       int work = 0;
-
-       /* net_rx_action's ->poll() invocations and our's are
-        * synchronized by this test which is only made while
-        * holding the napi->poll_lock.
-        */
-       if (!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &napi->state))
-               return;
+       int work;
 
        /* If we set this bit but see that it has already been set,
         * that indicates that napi has been disabled and we need