Both exec and exit want to ensure that the uaccess routines actually do
access user pointers. Use the newly added force_uaccess_begin helper
instead of an open coded set_fs for that to prepare for kernel builds
where set_fs() does not exist.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>
Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>
Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200710135706.537715-7-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
if (retval)
goto out_unlock;
- set_fs(USER_DS);
+ /*
+ * Ensure that the uaccess routines can actually operate on userspace
+ * pointers:
+ */
+ force_uaccess_begin();
+
me->flags &= ~(PF_RANDOMIZE | PF_FORKNOEXEC | PF_KTHREAD |
PF_NOFREEZE | PF_NO_SETAFFINITY);
flush_thread();
* mm_release()->clear_child_tid() from writing to a user-controlled
* kernel address.
*/
- set_fs(USER_DS);
+ force_uaccess_begin();
if (unlikely(in_atomic())) {
pr_info("note: %s[%d] exited with preempt_count %d\n",