powerpc: add show_stack_loglvl()

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization.  It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side.  In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.  And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers.  Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.

Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-27-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 048d64c4e11582023ce7dd70accbfbebabeffccd..a456b4454b3fd046ad7dd3303d8786e66ee57abc 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -2063,7 +2063,8 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
 
 static int kstack_depth_to_print = CONFIG_PRINT_STACK_DEPTH;
 
-void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
+void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack,
+                      const char *loglvl)
 {
        unsigned long sp, ip, lr, newsp;
        int count = 0;
@@ -2088,7 +2089,7 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
        }
 
        lr = 0;
-       printk("Call Trace:\n");
+       printk("%sCall Trace:\n", loglvl);
        do {
                if (!validate_sp(sp, tsk, STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD))
                        break;
@@ -2097,7 +2098,8 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
                newsp = stack[0];
                ip = stack[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
                if (!firstframe || ip != lr) {
-                       printk("["REG"] ["REG"] %pS", sp, ip, (void *)ip);
+                       printk("%s["REG"] ["REG"] %pS",
+                               loglvl, sp, ip, (void *)ip);
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
                        ret_addr = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current,
                                                &ftrace_idx, ip, stack);
@@ -2119,8 +2121,9 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
                        struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)
                                (sp + STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD);
                        lr = regs->link;
-                       printk("--- interrupt: %lx at %pS\n    LR = %pS\n",
-                              regs->trap, (void *)regs->nip, (void *)lr);
+                       printk("%s--- interrupt: %lx at %pS\n    LR = %pS\n",
+                              loglvl, regs->trap,
+                              (void *)regs->nip, (void *)lr);
                        firstframe = 1;
                }
 
@@ -2130,6 +2133,11 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
        put_task_stack(tsk);
 }
 
+void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
+{
+       show_stack_loglvl(tsk, stack, KERN_DEFAULT);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 /* Called with hard IRQs off */
 void notrace __ppc64_runlatch_on(void)