LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization

For a while now, the LSM core has said it was "initializED", rather than
"initializING". This adjust the report to be more accurate (i.e. before
this was reported before any LSMs had been initialized.)

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>

diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 736e78da1ab9d09271b2f34ace7a247c91fd5778..4cbcf244a9654b71916803fd0ea6d8cb9fbff426 100644 (file)
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -72,10 +72,11 @@ int __init security_init(void)
        int i;
        struct hlist_head *list = (struct hlist_head *) &security_hook_heads;
 
+       pr_info("Security Framework initializing\n");
+
        for (i = 0; i < sizeof(security_hook_heads) / sizeof(struct hlist_head);
             i++)
                INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&list[i]);
-       pr_info("Security Framework initialized\n");
 
        /*
         * Load minor LSMs, with the capability module always first.