In ACPI 6.4 spec, record types "0x0002-0xffff" of FPDT Performance Record
Types [1] and record types "0x0003-0xffff" of Runtime Performance Record
Types [2] are reserved.
Users might be confused with the FW_BUG message, and they think this
is the FW issue. Here is the example in a Lenovo box:
ACPI: FPDT 0x00000000A820A000 000044 (v01 LENOVO THINKSYS
00000100 01000013)
ACPI: Reserving FPDT table memory at [mem 0xa820a000-0xa820a043]
ACPI FPDT: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid record 4113 found
So, remove the FW_BUG message to avoid confusion since those types are
reserved in ACPI 6.4 spec.
[1] https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model/ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#fpdt-performance-record-types-table
[2] https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model/ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#runtime-performance-record-types-table
Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
break;
default:
- pr_err(FW_BUG "Invalid record %d found.\n", record_header->type);
- return -EINVAL;
+ /* Other types are reserved in ACPI 6.4 spec. */
+ break;
}
}
return 0;
subtable->type);
break;
default:
- pr_info(FW_BUG "Invalid subtable type %d found.\n",
- subtable->type);
+ /* Other types are reserved in ACPI 6.4 spec. */
break;
}
offset += sizeof(*subtable);