irqchip/gic-v3: Fix GICR_CTLR.RWP polling

It turns out that our polling of RWP is totally wrong when checking
for it in the redistributors, as we test the *distributor* bit index,
whereas it is a different bit number in the RDs... Oopsie boo.

This is embarassing. Not only because it is wrong, but also because
it took *8 years* to notice the blunder...

Just fix the damn thing.

Fixes: d760ce97deef ("irqchip: gic-v3: Initial support for GICv3")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220315165034.794482-2-maz@kernel.org

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 0efe1a9a9f3b234930c2a7a899a4ec16d0d4447f..9b6316582515c249506871b222feca91f47254a8 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -206,11 +206,11 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(struct irq_data *d)
        }
 }
 
-static void gic_do_wait_for_rwp(void __iomem *base)
+static void gic_do_wait_for_rwp(void __iomem *base, u32 bit)
 {
        u32 count = 1000000;    /* 1s! */
 
-       while (readl_relaxed(base + GICD_CTLR) & GICD_CTLR_RWP) {
+       while (readl_relaxed(base + GICD_CTLR) & bit) {
                count--;
                if (!count) {
                        pr_err_ratelimited("RWP timeout, gone fishing\n");
@@ -224,13 +224,13 @@ static void gic_do_wait_for_rwp(void __iomem *base)
 /* Wait for completion of a distributor change */
 static void gic_dist_wait_for_rwp(void)
 {
-       gic_do_wait_for_rwp(gic_data.dist_base);
+       gic_do_wait_for_rwp(gic_data.dist_base, GICD_CTLR_RWP);
 }
 
 /* Wait for completion of a redistributor change */
 static void gic_redist_wait_for_rwp(void)
 {
-       gic_do_wait_for_rwp(gic_data_rdist_rd_base());
+       gic_do_wait_for_rwp(gic_data_rdist_rd_base(), GICR_CTLR_RWP);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64