There's not reason SO_MARK would be allowed via setsockopt()
and not via cmsg, let's keep the two consistent. See
commit
079925cce1d0 ("net: allow SO_MARK with CAP_NET_RAW")
for justification why NET_RAW -> SO_MARK is safe.
Reviewed-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220131233357.52964-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
switch (cmsg->cmsg_type) {
case SO_MARK:
- if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+ if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW) &&
+ !ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(u32)))
return -EINVAL;