]> git.baikalelectronics.ru Git - kernel.git/commitdiff
drm/i915: Favor last VBT child device with conflicting AUX ch/DDC pin
authorVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Fri, 11 Oct 2019 20:20:30 +0000 (23:20 +0300)
committerVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Mon, 14 Oct 2019 13:58:19 +0000 (16:58 +0300)
The first come first served apporoach to handling the VBT
child device AUX ch conflicts has backfired. We have machines
in the wild where the VBT specifies both port A eDP and
port E DP (in that order) with port E being the real one.

So let's try to flip the preference around and let the last
child device win once again.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Tested-by: Masami Ichikawa <masami256@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Torsten <freedesktop201910@liggy.de>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111966
Fixes: 1ce57150efe8 ("drm/i915/bios: make child device order the priority order")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191011202030.8829-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c

index 9628b485b1793c1daa3fe3f1047f2bc258fa4a18..f0307b04cc1308ecc0c97a4b6a603e49d355d2ee 100644 (file)
@@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ static void sanitize_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %c trying to use the same DDC pin (0x%x) as port %c, "
                              "disabling port %c DVI/HDMI support\n",
                              port_name(port), info->alternate_ddc_pin,
-                             port_name(p), port_name(port));
+                             port_name(p), port_name(p));
 
                /*
                 * If we have multiple ports supposedly sharing the
@@ -1278,9 +1278,14 @@ static void sanitize_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                 * port. Otherwise they share the same ddc bin and
                 * system couldn't communicate with them separately.
                 *
-                * Give child device order the priority, first come first
-                * served.
+                * Give inverse child device order the priority,
+                * last one wins. Yes, there are real machines
+                * (eg. Asrock B250M-HDV) where VBT has both
+                * port A and port E with the same AUX ch and
+                * we must pick port E :(
                 */
+               info = &dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[p];
+
                info->supports_dvi = false;
                info->supports_hdmi = false;
                info->alternate_ddc_pin = 0;
@@ -1316,7 +1321,7 @@ static void sanitize_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %c trying to use the same AUX CH (0x%x) as port %c, "
                              "disabling port %c DP support\n",
                              port_name(port), info->alternate_aux_channel,
-                             port_name(p), port_name(port));
+                             port_name(p), port_name(p));
 
                /*
                 * If we have multiple ports supposedlt sharing the
@@ -1324,9 +1329,14 @@ static void sanitize_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                 * port. Otherwise they share the same aux channel
                 * and system couldn't communicate with them separately.
                 *
-                * Give child device order the priority, first come first
-                * served.
+                * Give inverse child device order the priority,
+                * last one wins. Yes, there are real machines
+                * (eg. Asrock B250M-HDV) where VBT has both
+                * port A and port E with the same AUX ch and
+                * we must pick port E :(
                 */
+               info = &dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[p];
+
                info->supports_dp = false;
                info->alternate_aux_channel = 0;
        }