,month="October"
,year="2001"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2001/10/13/105}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.33.0110131015410.8707-100000@penguin.transmeta.com}
[Viewed August 21, 2004]"
,annotation={
}
,month="October"
,year="2002"
,note="Available:
-\url{https://lkml.org/lkml/2002/10/24/262}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/3DB86B05.447E7410@us.ibm.com}
[Viewed February 15, 2014]"
,annotation={
Mingming Cao's patch to introduce RCU to SysV IPC.
,month="March"
,year="2003"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/3/9/205}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44.0303091831560.2129-100000@home.transmeta.com}
[Viewed March 13, 2006]"
,annotation={
Linus suggests replacing brlock with RCU and/or seqlocks:
,annotation={
RCU runs reasonably on a 512-CPU SGI using Manfred Spraul's patches,
which may be found at:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/20/49 (split vars into cachelines)
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/22/114 (cpu_quiet() patch)
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/24 (0/5)
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/23 (1/5)
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/265 (works for Jack)
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/20 (2/5)
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/22 (3/5)
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/19 (4/5)
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/21 (5/5)
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/40AC9823.6020709@colorfullife.com (split vars into cachelines)
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44.0405222141260.11106-100000@dbl.q-ag.de (cpu_quiet() patch)
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/200405250535.i4P5ZJo8017583@dbl.q-ag.de (0/5)
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/200405250535.i4P5ZKAQ017591@dbl.q-ag.de (1/5)
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20040525203215.GB5127@sgi.com (works for Jack)
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/200405250535.i4P5ZLiR017599@dbl.q-ag.de (2/5)
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/200405250535.i4P5ZMFt017607@dbl.q-ag.de (3/5)
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/200405250535.i4P5ZN6g017615@dbl.q-ag.de (4/5)
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/200405250535.i4P5ZO7I017623@dbl.q-ag.de (5/5)
}
}
,month="August"
,year="2004"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/6/237}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20040807192424.GF3936@in.ibm.com}
[Viewed June 8, 2010]"
,annotation={
Introduce rcu_dereference().
,month="August"
,year="2004"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/30/87}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/1093873222.984.12.camel@new.localdomain}
[Viewed February 17, 2005]"
,annotation={
Uses active code in rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() to
,month="October"
,year="2004"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/23/241}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20041023202723.GA1930@us.ibm.com}
[Viewed June 8, 2010]"
,annotation={
Introduce rcu_assign_pointer().
,annotation={
James Morris posts Kaigai Kohei's patch to LKML.
[Viewed December 10, 2004]
- Kaigai's patch is at https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/27/52
+ Kaigai's patch is at https://lore.kernel.org/r/200409271057.i8RAvcA1007873@mailsv.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp
}
}
,year="2005"
,day="17"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/17/199}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20050318002026.GA2693@us.ibm.com}
[Viewed September 5, 2005]"
,annotation={
First posting showing how RCU can be safely adapted for
,year="2005"
,day="18"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/18/122}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.OSF.4.05.10503181336310.2466-100000@da410.phys.au.dk}
[Viewed March 30, 2006]"
,annotation={
Esben Neilsen suggests read-side suppression of grace-period
,month="May"
,year="2005"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/9/185}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20050510012444.GA3011@us.ibm.com}
[Viewed May 13, 2005]"
,annotation={
First publication of working lock-based deferred free patches
,day="1"
,year="2005"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/1/155}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20050801171137.GA1754@us.ibm.com}
[Viewed March 14, 2006]"
,annotation={
First operating counter-based realtime RCU patch posted to LKML.
,day="8"
,year="2005"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/8/108}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20050808144216.GA1307@us.ibm.com}
[Viewed March 14, 2006]"
,annotation={
First operating counter-based realtime RCU patch posted to LKML,
,day="1"
,year="2005"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/10/1/70}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20051001182056.GA1613@us.ibm.com}
[Viewed March 14, 2006]"
,annotation={
First rcutorture patch.
,day="6"
,year="2006"
,note="Available:
-\url{https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/7/22}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20060106.231054.43576567.davem@davemloft.net}
[Viewed February 29, 2012]"
,annotation={
David Miller's view on hashed arrays of locks: used to really
,day="20"
,year="2006"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/20/238}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20060408134707.22479.33814.sendpatchset@linux.site}
[Viewed March 25, 2008]"
,annotation={
RCU-protected radix tree.
,day="28"
,year="2006"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/28/160}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20060928142616.GA20185@infradead.org}
[Viewed March 27, 2008]"
}
,year="2006"
,day=26
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/26/73}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20061026105731.GE11803@in.ibm.com}
[Viewed January 26, 2009]"
,annotation={
RCU-based reader-writer lock that allows readers to proceed with
,year="2006"
,day=17
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/17/56}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20061117092925.GT7164@kernel.dk}
[Viewed May 28, 2007]"
,annotation={
SRCU's grace periods are too slow for Jens, even after a
factor-of-three speedup.
- Sped-up version of SRCU at http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/17/359.
+ Sped-up version of SRCU at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20061118002845.GF2632@us.ibm.com.
}
}
,year="2006"
,day=19
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/19/69}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20061119190027.GA3676@oleg}
[Viewed May 28, 2007]"
,annotation={
First cut of QRCU. Expanded/corrected versions followed.
,year="2006"
,day=30
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/29/330}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20061130015714.GC1350@oleg}
[Viewed November 26, 2008]"
,annotation={
Expanded/corrected version of QRCU.
,year="2007"
,day=3
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/3/112}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20070103152738.GA16063@localdomain}
[Viewed May 28, 2007]"
,annotation={
Patch for list_splice_rcu().
,year="2007"
,day=28
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/28/34}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20070128120509.719287000@programming.kicks-ass.net}
[Viewed March 27, 2008]"
,annotation={
RCU-like implementation for frequent updaters and rare readers(!).
,year="2007"
,day=24
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/25/18}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20070225062349.GA17468@linux.vnet.ibm.com}
[Viewed March 27, 2008]"
,annotation={
Patch for QRCU supplying lock-free fast path.
,annotation={
LWN article describing Promela and spin, and also using Oleg
Nesterov's QRCU as an example (with Paul McKenney's fastpath).
- Merged patch at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/25/18
+ Merged patch at: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20070225062349.GA17468@linux.vnet.ibm.com
}
}
,day="10"
,year="2007"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/10/213}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20070910183004.GA3299@linux.vnet.ibm.com}
[Viewed October 25, 2007]"
,annotation={
Final patch for preemptable RCU to -rt. (Later patches were
,day="20"
,year="2007"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/244}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20071220142540.GB22523@Krystal}
[Viewed March 27, 2008]"
,annotation={
Request for call_rcu_sched() and rcu_barrier_sched().
,day="29"
,year="2008"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/29/208}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.58.0801291113350.20371@gandalf.stny.rr.com}
[Viewed March 27, 2008]"
,annotation={
Patch that prevents preemptible RCU from unnecessarily waking
,day="1"
,year="2008"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/2/255}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20080202214124.GA28612@linux.vnet.ibm.com}
[Viewed October 18, 2008]"
,annotation={
Explanation of compilers violating dependency ordering.
,day="3"
,year="2008"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/2/539}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/4844BE83.5010401@cn.fujitsu.com}
[Viewed December 10, 2008]"
,annotation={
Updated RCU classic algorithm. Introduced multi-tailed list
,day="21"
,year="2008"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/21/336}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/48AD8969.7060900@colorfullife.com}
[Viewed December 8, 2008]"
,annotation={
State-based RCU. One key thing that this patch does is to
,day="6"
,year="2008"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/6/86}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/48C2B1D2.5070801@colorfullife.com}
[Viewed December 8, 2008]"
,annotation={
Manfred notes a fix required to my attempt to separate irq
,day="14"
,year="2009"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/449}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20090114202044.GJ6734@linux.vnet.ibm.com}
[Viewed January 15, 2009]"
,annotation={
Small-footprint implementation of RCU for uniprocessor
git://lttng.org/userspace-rcu.git
http://lttng.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=userspace-rcu.git
http://lttng.org/urcu
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/5/572
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20090206030543.GB8560@Krystal
}
}
,day="25"
,year="2009"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/306}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20090625160706.GA9467@linux.vnet.ibm.com}
[Viewed August 16, 2009]"
,annotation={
First posting of expedited RCU to be accepted into -tip.
,day="23"
,year="2009"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/23/294}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20090724001429.GA17374@linux.vnet.ibm.com}
[Viewed August 15, 2009]"
,annotation={
First posting of simple and fast preemptable RCU.
,month="December"
,year="2009"
,note="Available:
-\url{http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/18/129}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20091018232918.GA7385@Krystal}
[Viewed December 29, 2009]"
,annotation={
Mathieu proposed defer_rcu() with fixed-size per-thread pool
,month="January"
,year="2011"
,note="Available:
-\url{https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/18/322}
+\url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/AANLkTimajU0x1v6y3rH2+jr-bZ=tNLs1S_agXdGGAa3S@mail.gmail.com}
[Viewed March 4, 2011]"
,annotation={
"The RCU-based name lookup is at the other end of the spectrum - the
==================
Control Groupstats is inspired by the discussion at
-http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/11/187 and implements per cgroup statistics as
-suggested by Andrew Morton in http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/11/263.
+https://lore.kernel.org/r/461CF883.2030308@sw.ru and implements per cgroup statistics as
+suggested by Andrew Morton in https://lore.kernel.org/r/20070411114927.1277d7c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org.
Per cgroup statistics infrastructure re-uses code from the taskstats
interface. A new set of cgroup operations are registered with commands
2. Singh, Balbir. Memory Controller (RSS Control),
http://lwn.net/Articles/222762/
3. Emelianov, Pavel. Resource controllers based on process cgroups
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/6/198
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/45ED7DEC.7010403@sw.ru
4. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v2)
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/9/78
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/461A3010.90403@sw.ru
5. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v3)
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/30/244
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/465D9739.8070209@openvz.org
6. Menage, Paul. Control Groups v10, http://lwn.net/Articles/236032/
7. Vaidyanathan, Srinivasan, Control Groups: Pagecache accounting and control
subsystem (v3), http://lwn.net/Articles/235534/
8. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 test results (lmbench),
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/17/232
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/464C95D4.7070806@linux.vnet.ibm.com
9. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 AIM9 results
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/18/1
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/464D267A.50107@linux.vnet.ibm.com
10. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller v6 test results,
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/19/36
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20070819094658.654.84837.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop
11. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller introduction (v6),
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/17/69
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20070817084228.26003.12568.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop
12. Corbet, Jonathan, Controlling memory use in cgroups,
http://lwn.net/Articles/243795/
References
----------
-- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/6
+- https://lore.kernel.org/r/loom.20070212T063225-663@post.gmane.org
- Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst (1.8)
However, there is an RFC patch from Christoph Lameter
(based on an earlier one from Gilad Ben-Yossef) that
reduces or even eliminates vmstat overhead for some
- workloads at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/4/379.
+ workloads at https://lore.kernel.org/r/00000140e9dfd6bd-40db3d4f-c1be-434f-8132-7820f81bb586-000000@email.amazonses.com.
e. If running on high-end powerpc servers, build with
CONFIG_PPC_RTAS_DAEMON=n. This prevents the RTAS
daemon from running on each CPU every second or so.
level and edge IRQs
* [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg120425.html
-* [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/494
-* [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/495
+* [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1443209283-20781-2-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com
+* [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1443209283-20781-3-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com
Requesting self-owned GPIO pins
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/306579/
- [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] Kernel based bootsplash
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/13/764
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20171213194755.3409-1-mstaudt@suse.de
Contact: Sam Ravnborg
safeguards against race conditions that might occur in such a case.
Although Linus Torvalds doesn't like the freezing of tasks, he said this in one
-of the discussions on LKML (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/27/608):
+of the discussions on LKML (https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.0.98.0704271801020.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org):
"RJW:> Why we freeze tasks at all or why we freeze kernel threads?
https://lwn.net/Articles/486306/
- Recommendation from Andrew Morton that all related information for a new
system call should come in the same email thread:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/24/641
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20140724144747.3041b208832bbdf9fbce5d96@linux-foundation.org
- Recommendation from Michael Kerrisk that a new system call should come with
- a man page: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/13/309
+ a man page: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAKgNAkgMA39AfoSoA5Pe1r9N+ZzfYQNvNPvcRN7tOvRb8+v06Q@mail.gmail.com
- Suggestion from Thomas Gleixner that x86 wire-up should be in a separate
- commit: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/19/254
+ commit: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1411191249560.3909@nanos
- Suggestion from Greg Kroah-Hartman that it's good for new system calls to
- come with a man-page & selftest: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/19/710
+ come with a man-page & selftest: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20140320025530.GA25469@kroah.com
- Discussion from Michael Kerrisk of new system call vs. :manpage:`prctl(2)` extension:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/3/411
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHO5Pa3F2MjfTtfNxa8LbnkeeU8=YJ+9tDqxZpw7Gz59E-4AUg@mail.gmail.com
- Suggestion from Ingo Molnar that system calls that involve multiple
arguments should encapsulate those arguments in a struct, which includes a
- size field for future extensibility: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/30/117
+ size field for future extensibility: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20150730083831.GA22182@gmail.com
- Numbering oddities arising from (re-)use of O_* numbering space flags:
- commit 75069f2b5bfb ("vfs: renumber FMODE_NONOTIFY and add to uniqueness
- commit bb458c644a59 ("Safer ABI for O_TMPFILE")
- Discussion from Matthew Wilcox about restrictions on 64-bit arguments:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/12/187
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20081212152929.GM26095@parisc-linux.org
- Recommendation from Greg Kroah-Hartman that unknown flags should be
- policed: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/17/577
+ policed: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20140717193330.GB4703@kroah.com
- Recommendation from Linus Torvalds that x32 system calls should prefer
compatibility with 64-bit versions rather than 32-bit versions:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/31/244
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFxfmwfB7jbbrXxa=K7VBYPfAvmu3XOkGrLbB1UFjX1+Ew@mail.gmail.com
<http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/maintainer-06.html>
NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!
- <https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/11/336>
+ <https://lore.kernel.org/r/20050711.125305.08322243.davem@davemloft.net>
Kernel Documentation/process/coding-style.rst:
:ref:`Documentation/process/coding-style.rst <codingstyle>`
Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format:
- <http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>
+ <https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.58.0504071023190.28951@ppc970.osdl.org>
Andi Kleen, "On submitting kernel patches"
Some strategies to get difficult or controversial changes in.
and how to prevent non-root users "cheat" the system?
As already discussed, we are planning also to merge this work with the EDF
- throttling patches [https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/23/239] but we still are in
+ throttling patches [https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1266931410.git.fabio@helm.retis] but we still are in
the preliminary phases of the merge and we really seek feedback that would
help us decide on the direction it should take.
Linux Security Module Development
=================================
-Based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/26/215,
+Based on https://lore.kernel.org/r/20071026073721.618b4778@laptopd505.fenrus.org,
a new LSM is accepted into the kernel when its intent (a description of
what it tries to protect against and in what cases one would expect to
use it) has been appropriately documented in ``Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/``.
- Why not msleep for (1ms - 20ms)?
Explained originally here:
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/3/250
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/15327.1186166232@lwn.net
msleep(1~20) may not do what the caller intends, and
will often sleep longer (~20 ms actual sleep for any
https://lwn.net/Articles/486306/
- Raccomandazioni da Andrew Morton circa il fatto che tutte le informazioni
su una nuova chiamata di sistema dovrebbero essere contenute nello stesso
- filone di discussione di email: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/24/641
+ filone di discussione di email: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20140724144747.3041b208832bbdf9fbce5d96@linux-foundation.org
- Raccomandazioni da Michael Kerrisk circa il fatto che le nuove chiamate di
- sistema dovrebbero avere una pagina man: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/13/309
+ sistema dovrebbero avere una pagina man: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAKgNAkgMA39AfoSoA5Pe1r9N+ZzfYQNvNPvcRN7tOvRb8+v06Q@mail.gmail.com
- Consigli da Thomas Gleixner sul fatto che il collegamento all'architettura
x86 dovrebbe avvenire in un *commit* differente:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/19/254
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1411191249560.3909@nanos
- Consigli da Greg Kroah-Hartman circa la bontà d'avere una pagina man e un
programma di auto-verifica per le nuove chiamate di sistema:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/19/710
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20140320025530.GA25469@kroah.com
- Discussione di Michael Kerrisk sulle nuove chiamate di sistema contro
- le estensioni :manpage:`prctl(2)`: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/3/411
+ le estensioni :manpage:`prctl(2)`: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHO5Pa3F2MjfTtfNxa8LbnkeeU8=YJ+9tDqxZpw7Gz59E-4AUg@mail.gmail.com
- Consigli da Ingo Molnar che le chiamate di sistema con più argomenti
dovrebbero incapsularli in una struttura che includa un argomento
*size* per garantire l'estensibilità futura:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/30/117
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20150730083831.GA22182@gmail.com
- Un certo numero di casi strani emersi dall'uso (riuso) dei flag O_*:
- commit 75069f2b5bfb ("vfs: renumber FMODE_NONOTIFY and add to uniqueness
- commit bb458c644a59 ("Safer ABI for O_TMPFILE")
- Discussion from Matthew Wilcox about restrictions on 64-bit arguments:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/12/187
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/20081212152929.GM26095@parisc-linux.org
- Raccomandazioni da Greg Kroah-Hartman sul fatto che i flag sconosciuti dovrebbero
- essere controllati: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/17/577
+ essere controllati: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20140717193330.GB4703@kroah.com
- Raccomandazioni da Linus Torvalds che le chiamate di sistema x32 dovrebbero
favorire la compatibilità con le versioni a 64-bit piuttosto che quelle a 32-bit:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/31/244
+ https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFxfmwfB7jbbrXxa=K7VBYPfAvmu3XOkGrLbB1UFjX1+Ew@mail.gmail.com
<http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/maintainer-06.html>
No!!!! Basta gigantesche bombe patch alle persone sulla lista linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org!
- <https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/11/336>
+ <https://lore.kernel.org/r/20050711.125305.08322243.davem@davemloft.net>
Kernel Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/coding-style.rst:
:ref:`Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/coding-style.rst <it_codingstyle>`
E-mail di Linus Torvalds sul formato canonico di una patch:
- <http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>
+ <https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.58.0504071023190.28951@ppc970.osdl.org>
Andi Kleen, "Su come sottomettere patch del kernel"
Alcune strategie su come sottomettere modifiche toste o controverse.
<http://www.kroah.com/log/2006/01/11/>
NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!
- <https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/11/336>
+ <https://lore.kernel.org/r/20050711.125305.08322243.davem@davemloft.net>
Kernel Documentation/process/coding-style.rst:
<http://users.sosdg.org/~qiyong/lxr/source/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst>
Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format:
- <http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>
+ <https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.58.0504071023190.28951@ppc970.osdl.org>
Andi Kleen, "On submitting kernel patches"
Some strategies to get difficult or controversial changes in.
参考
---
-- http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/6
+- https://lore.kernel.org/r/loom.20070212T063225-663@post.gmane.org
- Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst (1.8)
<http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/maintainer-06.html>
NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!
- <https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/11/336>
+ <https://lore.kernel.org/r/20050711.125305.08322243.davem@davemloft.net>
Kernel Documentation/process/coding-style.rst:
:ref:`Documentation/translations/zh_CN/process/coding-style.rst <cn_codingstyle>`
Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format:
- <http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>
+ <https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.58.0504071023190.28951@ppc970.osdl.org>
Andi Kleen, "On submitting kernel patches"
Some strategies to get difficult or controversial changes in.
projects / kernel.git / commitdiff