drm/dp_mst: Fix drm_dp_check_mstb_guid() return code

We actually expect this to return a 0 on success, or negative error code
on failure. In order to do that, we check whether or not we managed to
write the whole GUID and then return 0 if so, otherwise return a
negative error code. Also, let's add an error message here so it's a
little more obvious when this fails in the middle of a link address
probe.

This should fix issues with certain MST hubs seemingly stopping for no
reason in the middle of the link address probe process.

Fixes: 106cb81da6f4 ("drm/dp_mst: Fix W=1 warnings")
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306234923.547873-3-lyude@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 6485ecaddbcb2a1e07effb96593b8d8869a235eb..412f8f7ecc344d13479527dd66dee5d561661bcd 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -2092,7 +2092,10 @@ static int drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, u8 *guid)
                }
        }
 
-       return ret;
+       if (ret < 16 && ret > 0)
+               return -EPROTO;
+
+       return ret == 16 ? 0 : ret;
 }
 
 static void build_mst_prop_path(const struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
@@ -2907,8 +2910,14 @@ static int drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
        drm_dp_dump_link_address(reply);
 
        ret = drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mstb, reply->guid);
-       if (ret)
+       if (ret) {
+               char buf[64];
+
+               drm_dp_mst_rad_to_str(mstb->rad, mstb->lct, buf, sizeof(buf));
+               DRM_ERROR("GUID check on %s failed: %d\n",
+                         buf, ret);
                goto out;
+       }
 
        for (i = 0; i < reply->nports; i++) {
                port_mask |= BIT(reply->ports[i].port_number);