tcp: Fix bind() regression for v4-mapped-v6 non-wildcard address.

[ Upstream commit c48ef9c4aed3632566b57ba66cec6ec78624d4cb ]

Since bhash2 was introduced, the example below does not work as expected.
These two bind() should conflict, but the 2nd bind() now succeeds.

  from socket import *

  s1 = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM)
  s1.bind(('::ffff:127.0.0.1', 0))

  s2 = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM)
  s2.bind(('127.0.0.1', s1.getsockname()[1]))

During the 2nd bind() in inet_csk_get_port(), inet_bind2_bucket_find()
fails to find the 1st socket's tb2, so inet_bind2_bucket_create() allocates
a new tb2 for the 2nd socket.  Then, we call inet_csk_bind_conflict() that
checks conflicts in the new tb2 by inet_bhash2_conflict().  However, the
new tb2 does not include the 1st socket, thus the bind() finally succeeds.

In this case, inet_bind2_bucket_match() must check if AF_INET6 tb2 has
the conflicting v4-mapped-v6 address so that inet_bind2_bucket_find()
returns the 1st socket's tb2.

Note that if we bind two sockets to 127.0.0.1 and then ::FFFF:127.0.0.1,
the 2nd bind() fails properly for the same reason mentinoed in the previous
commit.

Fixes: 28044fc1d495 ("net: Add a bhash2 table hashed by port and address")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index eb522c0374d5984080bfc0ce74e5e9fc853a4c19..d79de4b95186beb440bc4e6e3e73d7dbc8bfb5c1 100644 (file)
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -800,8 +800,13 @@ static bool inet_bind2_bucket_match(const struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb,
                return false;
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
-       if (sk->sk_family != tb->family)
+       if (sk->sk_family != tb->family) {
+               if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET)
+                       return ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr) &&
+                               tb->v6_rcv_saddr.s6_addr32[3] == sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
+
                return false;
+       }
 
        if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
                return ipv6_addr_equal(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr, &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr);