This hasn't been used since it was first introduced in commit
91b68fbe4304 ("btrfs: Introduce find_free_extent_ctl structure for later
rework"). Passing that to btrfs_add_reserved_bytes in find_free_extent
is not strictly necessary and using the local ram_bytes instead seems
cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
*/
struct find_free_extent_ctl {
/* Basic allocation info */
- u64 ram_bytes;
u64 num_bytes;
u64 empty_size;
u64 flags;
WARN_ON(num_bytes < fs_info->sectorsize);
- ffe_ctl.ram_bytes = ram_bytes;
ffe_ctl.num_bytes = num_bytes;
ffe_ctl.empty_size = empty_size;
ffe_ctl.flags = flags;