Some users check the return value of devm_rtc_nvmem_register() only in
order to emit an error message and then continue probing. This is fine
as an rtc can function without exposing nvmem but let's generalize it:
let's make the registration function emit the error message so that
users don't have to.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-7-brgl@bgdev.pl
int devm_rtc_nvmem_register(struct rtc_device *rtc,
struct nvmem_config *nvmem_config)
{
+ struct device *dev = rtc->dev.parent;
struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
if (!nvmem_config)
return -ENODEV;
- nvmem_config->dev = rtc->dev.parent;
+ nvmem_config->dev = dev;
nvmem_config->owner = rtc->owner;
- nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(rtc->dev.parent, nvmem_config);
+ nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(dev, nvmem_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to register nvmem device for RTC\n");
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(nvmem);
}
/* export at least the first block of NVRAM */
nvmem_cfg.size = address_space - NVRAM_OFFSET;
- if (devm_rtc_nvmem_register(cmos_rtc.rtc, &nvmem_cfg))
- dev_err(dev, "nvmem registration failed\n");
+ devm_rtc_nvmem_register(cmos_rtc.rtc, &nvmem_cfg);
dev_info(dev, "%s%s, %d bytes nvram%s\n",
!is_valid_irq(rtc_irq) ? "no alarms" :
}
}
- if (devm_rtc_nvmem_register(pdata->rtc, &nvmem_cfg))
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to register nvmem\n");
+ devm_rtc_nvmem_register(pdata->rtc, &nvmem_cfg);
return 0;
}
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (devm_rtc_nvmem_register(rtc, &nvmem_cfg))
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to register nvmem\n");
+ devm_rtc_nvmem_register(rtc, &nvmem_cfg);
return 0;
}