spi: spi-geni-qcom: Remove confusing comment about setting the watermark

The comment in setup_fifo_xfer() about setting the watermark wasn't
quite proper grammar and also stopped making sense around commit
329fa7a15b47 ("spi: spi-geni-qcom: Don't wait to start 1st transfer if
transmitting"). After that commit we actually start the transfer
_before_ the watermark interrupt comes.

I don't think the comment really has any value anymore. We've already
got a comment when we grab the spinlock saying that our interrupt can
come any time as a result of the things in the locked section. Let's
just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210712085010.1.Ie3bb9f9d30d6475bb75251d32635194c1c72b9ee@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c b/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c
index b3861fb88711a0fb6f1ac21e93c821f2a3548799..2f51421e2a71850b9d8fa9d399211c2d16dd63ba 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c
@@ -549,12 +549,6 @@ static void setup_fifo_xfer(struct spi_transfer *xfer,
         */
        spin_lock_irq(&mas->lock);
        geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, m_cmd, FRAGMENTATION);
-
-       /*
-        * TX_WATERMARK_REG should be set after SPI configuration and
-        * setting up GENI SE engine, as driver starts data transfer
-        * for the watermark interrupt.
-        */
        if (m_cmd & SPI_TX_ONLY) {
                if (geni_spi_handle_tx(mas))
                        writel(mas->tx_wm, se->base + SE_GENI_TX_WATERMARK_REG);