This patch avoids that sparse reports the following warnings:
CHECK block/blk-wbt.c
block/blk-wbt.c:600:6: warning: symbol 'wbt_issue' was not declared. Should it be static?
block/blk-wbt.c:620:6: warning: symbol 'wbt_requeue' was not declared. Should it be static?
CC block/blk-wbt.o
block/blk-wbt.c:600:6: warning: no previous prototype for wbt_issue [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq)
^~~~~~~~~
block/blk-wbt.c:620:6: warning: no previous prototype for wbt_requeue [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq)
^~~~~~~~~~~
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
rq->wbt_flags |= bio_to_wbt_flags(rwb, bio);
}
-void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq)
+static void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq)
{
struct rq_wb *rwb = RQWB(rqos);
}
}
-void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq)
+static void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq)
{
struct rq_wb *rwb = RQWB(rqos);
if (!rwb_enabled(rwb))