]> git.baikalelectronics.ru Git - kernel.git/commitdiff
bpf: Handle multiple variable additions into packet pointers in verifier.
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fri, 12 May 2017 02:30:02 +0000 (19:30 -0700)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fri, 12 May 2017 02:48:58 +0000 (19:48 -0700)
We must accumulate into reg->aux_off rather than use a plain assignment.

Add a test for this situation to test_align.

Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c

index e74fb1b878559f7eab562541818f9b52093a433e..39f2dcbc4cbc0021de60d8dcea178b2de93e74d1 100644 (file)
@@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ add_imm:
                dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen;
 
                /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */
-               dst_reg->aux_off = dst_reg->off;
+               dst_reg->aux_off += dst_reg->off;
                dst_reg->off = 0;
                dst_reg->range = 0;
                if (had_id)
index ed242552e492d389f2ade69ca738832cb9e30fdc..9644d4e069dec3e43ec654f6f44d933a02a7878a 100644 (file)
@@ -273,6 +273,20 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
                        BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
                        BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5, 0),
 
+                       /* Test multiple accumulations of unknown values
+                        * into a packet pointer.
+                        */
+                       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_2),
+                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_5, 14),
+                       BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_6),
+                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_5, 4),
+                       BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_6),
+                       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5),
+                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_4, 4),
+                       BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4, 1),
+                       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+                       BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5, 0),
+
                        BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
                        BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
                },
@@ -314,6 +328,29 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
                         * requirements.
                         */
                        "23: R0=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8) R1=ctx R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8) R3=pkt_end R4=pkt(id=2,off=18,r=18),aux_off_align=4 R5=pkt(id=2,off=14,r=18),aux_off_align=4 R6=inv54,min_align=4 R10=fp",
+
+                       /* Constant offset is added to R5 packet pointer,
+                        * resulting in reg->off value of 14.
+                        */
+                       "26: R0=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8) R1=ctx R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8) R3=pkt_end R4=inv,aux_off_align=4 R5=pkt(id=0,off=14,r=8) R6=inv54,min_align=4 R10=fp",
+                       /* Variable offset is added to R5, resulting in an
+                        * auxiliary offset of 14, and an auxiliary alignment of 4.
+                        */
+                       "27: R0=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8) R1=ctx R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8) R3=pkt_end R4=inv,aux_off_align=4 R5=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0),aux_off=14,aux_off_align=4 R6=inv54,min_align=4 R10=fp",
+                       /* Constant is added to R5 again, setting reg->off to 4. */
+                       "28: R0=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8) R1=ctx R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8) R3=pkt_end R4=inv,aux_off_align=4 R5=pkt(id=3,off=4,r=0),aux_off=14,aux_off_align=4 R6=inv54,min_align=4 R10=fp",
+                       /* And once more we add a variable, which causes an accumulation
+                        * of reg->off into reg->aux_off_align, with resulting value of
+                        * 18.  The auxiliary alignment stays at 4.
+                        */
+                       "29: R0=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8) R1=ctx R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8) R3=pkt_end R4=inv,aux_off_align=4 R5=pkt(id=4,off=0,r=0),aux_off=18,aux_off_align=4 R6=inv54,min_align=4 R10=fp",
+                       /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5,
+                        * it's total offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (0) +
+                        * reg->aux_off (18) which is 20.  Then the variable offset
+                        * is considered using reg->aux_off_align which is 4 and meets
+                        * the load's requirements.
+                        */
+                       "33: R0=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8) R1=ctx R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8) R3=pkt_end R4=pkt(id=4,off=4,r=4),aux_off=18,aux_off_align=4 R5=pkt(id=4,off=0,r=4),aux_off=18,aux_off_align=4 R6=inv54,min_align=4 R10=fp",
                },
        },
 };