Andreas reported that he was seeing the tdbtorture test fail in some
cases with -EDEADLCK when it wasn't before. Some debugging showed that
deadlock detection was sometimes discovering the caller's lock request
itself in a dependency chain.
While we remove the request from the blocked_lock_hash prior to
reattempting to acquire it, any locks that are blocked on that request
will still be present in the hash and will still have their fl_blocker
pointer set to the current request.
This causes posix_locks_deadlock to find a deadlock dependency chain
when it shouldn't, as a lock request cannot block itself.
We are going to end up waking all of those blocked locks anyway when we
go to reinsert the request back into the blocked_lock_hash, so just do
it prior to checking for deadlocks. This ensures that any lock blocked
on the current request will no longer be part of any blocked request
chain.
URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202975
Fixes: 7fb6bb143600 ("fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
*/
error = -EDEADLK;
spin_lock(&blocked_lock_lock);
+ /*
+ * Ensure that we don't find any locks blocked on this
+ * request during deadlock detection.
+ */
+ __locks_wake_up_blocks(request);
if (likely(!posix_locks_deadlock(request, fl))) {
error = FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED;
__locks_insert_block(fl, request,