Unlikely, but we could have ui_progress__init being called with total <
16, which would set the next and step variables to 0. That would force
unnecessary ui_progress__ops->update calls because 'next' would never
raise.
Forcing the next and step values to be always > 0.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170908120510.22515-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
void ui_progress__init(struct ui_progress *p, u64 total, const char *title)
{
p->curr = 0;
- p->next = p->step = total / 16;
+ p->next = p->step = total / 16 ?: 1;
p->total = total;
p->title = title;