This gets rid of the following lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock:
(&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<
000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
but task is already holding lock:
(&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<
000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
__might_fault+0x63/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70
filldir+0x8c/0xf0
dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160
iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150
SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89
-> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}:
lockref_get+0x9/0x20
-> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}:
wait_for_common+0x54/0x210
devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150
device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0
device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0
device_create+0x35/0x40
msr_device_create+0x22/0x40
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210
smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270
kthread+0x173/0x1b0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
-> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}:
cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0
__cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0
__cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50
page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c
start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2
secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0
-> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
__cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0
__cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50
page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26
start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2
secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0
-> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}:
cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0
apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40
__alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1
intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915]
intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915]
i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915]
i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915]
i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915]
i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915]
pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120
driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480
__driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0
bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90
bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260
driver_register+0x52/0xc0
do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150
do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef
load_module+0x231c/0x2d70
SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89
-> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}:
lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200
__mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915]
__do_fault+0x15/0x70
__handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40
handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0
__do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560
page_fault+0x22/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5);
lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351:
#0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<
000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1
Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x5f/0x86
print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0
check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0
? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20
? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30
? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0
__lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0
lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200
? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
__mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80
i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915]
__do_fault+0x15/0x70
__handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40
handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0
__do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560
page_fault+0x22/0x30
RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116
RSP: 002b:
00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS:
00010283
RAX:
00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX:
0000000000000000 RCX:
0000000000001680
RDX:
0000000000001680 RSI:
00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI:
00007f98d39a2bc0
RBP:
00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08:
0000000000000000 R09:
00000000000005a0
R10:
000055e847c2a830 R11:
0000000000000002 R12:
0000000000000001
R13:
000055e847c1d040 R14:
00007ffd6ffc3400 R15:
00007f98d6752ba0
v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris)
v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris)
Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
i915_gem_contexts_fini(dev_priv);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
+ intel_uc_fini_wq(dev_priv);
i915_gem_cleanup_userptr(dev_priv);
i915_gem_drain_freed_objects(dev_priv);
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = intel_uc_init_wq(dev_priv);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
/* This is just a security blanket to placate dragons.
* On some systems, we very sporadically observe that the first TLBs
* used by the CS may be stale, despite us poking the TLB reset. If
guc->notify = gen8_guc_raise_irq;
}
+int intel_guc_init_wq(struct intel_guc *guc)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
+
+ /*
+ * GuC log buffer flush work item has to do register access to
+ * send the ack to GuC and this work item, if not synced before
+ * suspend, can potentially get executed after the GFX device is
+ * suspended.
+ * By marking the WQ as freezable, we don't have to bother about
+ * flushing of this work item from the suspend hooks, the pending
+ * work item if any will be either executed before the suspend
+ * or scheduled later on resume. This way the handling of work
+ * item can be kept same between system suspend & rpm suspend.
+ */
+ guc->log.runtime.flush_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915-guc_log",
+ WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_FREEZABLE);
+ if (!guc->log.runtime.flush_wq)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /*
+ * Even though both sending GuC action, and adding a new workitem to
+ * GuC workqueue are serialized (each with its own locking), since
+ * we're using mutliple engines, it's possible that we're going to
+ * issue a preempt request with two (or more - each for different
+ * engine) workitems in GuC queue. In this situation, GuC may submit
+ * all of them, which will make us very confused.
+ * Our preemption contexts may even already be complete - before we
+ * even had the chance to sent the preempt action to GuC!. Rather
+ * than introducing yet another lock, we can just use ordered workqueue
+ * to make sure we're always sending a single preemption request with a
+ * single workitem.
+ */
+ if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(dev_priv) &&
+ USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)) {
+ guc->preempt_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915-guc_preempt",
+ WQ_HIGHPRI);
+ if (!guc->preempt_wq) {
+ destroy_workqueue(guc->log.runtime.flush_wq);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void intel_guc_fini_wq(struct intel_guc *guc)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
+
+ if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(dev_priv) &&
+ USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv))
+ destroy_workqueue(guc->preempt_wq);
+
+ destroy_workqueue(guc->log.runtime.flush_wq);
+}
+
static int guc_shared_data_create(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
struct i915_vma *vma;
void intel_guc_init_early(struct intel_guc *guc);
void intel_guc_init_send_regs(struct intel_guc *guc);
void intel_guc_init_params(struct intel_guc *guc);
+int intel_guc_init_wq(struct intel_guc *guc);
+void intel_guc_fini_wq(struct intel_guc *guc);
int intel_guc_init(struct intel_guc *guc);
void intel_guc_fini(struct intel_guc *guc);
int intel_guc_send_nop(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len);
guc->log.runtime.relay_chan = guc_log_relay_chan;
INIT_WORK(&guc->log.runtime.flush_work, capture_logs_work);
-
- /*
- * GuC log buffer flush work item has to do register access to
- * send the ack to GuC and this work item, if not synced before
- * suspend, can potentially get executed after the GFX device is
- * suspended.
- * By marking the WQ as freezable, we don't have to bother about
- * flushing of this work item from the suspend hooks, the pending
- * work item if any will be either executed before the suspend
- * or scheduled later on resume. This way the handling of work
- * item can be kept same between system suspend & rpm suspend.
- */
- guc->log.runtime.flush_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915-guc_log",
- WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_FREEZABLE);
- if (!guc->log.runtime.flush_wq) {
- DRM_ERROR("Couldn't allocate the wq for GuC logging\n");
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_relaychan;
- }
-
return 0;
-err_relaychan:
- relay_close(guc->log.runtime.relay_chan);
err_vaddr:
i915_gem_object_unpin_map(guc->log.vma->obj);
guc->log.runtime.buf_addr = NULL;
if (!guc_log_has_runtime(guc))
return;
- destroy_workqueue(guc->log.runtime.flush_wq);
relay_close(guc->log.runtime.relay_chan);
i915_gem_object_unpin_map(guc->log.vma->obj);
guc->log.runtime.buf_addr = NULL;
i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&guc->ads_vma);
}
-static int guc_preempt_work_create(struct intel_guc *guc)
-{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
- struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
- enum intel_engine_id id;
-
- /*
- * Even though both sending GuC action, and adding a new workitem to
- * GuC workqueue are serialized (each with its own locking), since
- * we're using mutliple engines, it's possible that we're going to
- * issue a preempt request with two (or more - each for different
- * engine) workitems in GuC queue. In this situation, GuC may submit
- * all of them, which will make us very confused.
- * Our preemption contexts may even already be complete - before we
- * even had the chance to sent the preempt action to GuC!. Rather
- * than introducing yet another lock, we can just use ordered workqueue
- * to make sure we're always sending a single preemption request with a
- * single workitem.
- */
- guc->preempt_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915-guc_preempt",
- WQ_HIGHPRI);
- if (!guc->preempt_wq)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
- guc->preempt_work[id].engine = engine;
- INIT_WORK(&guc->preempt_work[id].work, inject_preempt_context);
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void guc_preempt_work_destroy(struct intel_guc *guc)
-{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
- struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
- enum intel_engine_id id;
-
- for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id)
- cancel_work_sync(&guc->preempt_work[id].work);
-
- destroy_workqueue(guc->preempt_wq);
- guc->preempt_wq = NULL;
-}
-
/*
* Set up the memory resources to be shared with the GuC (via the GGTT)
* at firmware loading time.
*/
int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+ enum intel_engine_id id;
int ret;
if (guc->stage_desc_pool)
if (ret < 0)
goto err_stage_desc_pool;
- ret = guc_preempt_work_create(guc);
- if (ret)
- goto err_log;
- GEM_BUG_ON(!guc->preempt_wq);
-
ret = guc_ads_create(guc);
if (ret < 0)
- goto err_wq;
+ goto err_log;
GEM_BUG_ON(!guc->ads_vma);
+ for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) {
+ guc->preempt_work[id].engine = engine;
+ INIT_WORK(&guc->preempt_work[id].work, inject_preempt_context);
+ }
+
return 0;
-err_wq:
- guc_preempt_work_destroy(guc);
err_log:
intel_guc_log_destroy(guc);
err_stage_desc_pool:
void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+ enum intel_engine_id id;
+
+ for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id)
+ cancel_work_sync(&guc->preempt_work[id].work);
+
guc_ads_destroy(guc);
- guc_preempt_work_destroy(guc);
intel_guc_log_destroy(guc);
guc_stage_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
}
int intel_guc_submission_enable(struct intel_guc *guc);
void intel_guc_submission_disable(struct intel_guc *guc);
void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc);
+int intel_guc_preempt_work_create(struct intel_guc *guc);
+void intel_guc_preempt_work_destroy(struct intel_guc *guc);
#endif
guc->send = intel_guc_send_nop;
}
+int intel_uc_init_wq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!USES_GUC(dev_priv))
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = intel_guc_init_wq(&dev_priv->guc);
+ if (ret) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Couldn't allocate workqueues for GuC\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void intel_uc_fini_wq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ if (!USES_GUC(dev_priv))
+ return;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(dev_priv));
+
+ intel_guc_fini_wq(&dev_priv->guc);
+}
+
int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
void intel_uc_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uc_init_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uc_fini_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int intel_uc_init_wq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+void intel_uc_fini_wq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
projects / kernel.git / commitdiff