Pull tracing fixes from Steven Rostedt:
"Fix tracepoint race between static_call and callback data
As callbacks to a tracepoint are paired with the data that is passed
in when the callback is registered to the tracepoint, it must have
that data passed to the callback when the tracepoint is triggered,
else bad things will happen. To keep the two together, they are both
assigned to a tracepoint structure and added to an array. The
tracepoint call site will dereference the structure (via RCU) and call
the callback in that structure along with the data in that structure.
This keeps the callback and data tightly coupled.
Because of the overhead that retpolines have on tracepoint callbacks,
if there's only one callback attached to a tracepoint (a common case),
then it is called via a static call (code modified to do a direct call
instead of an indirect call). But to implement this, the data had to
be decoupled from the callback, as now the callback is implemented via
a direct call from the static call and not an indirect call from the
dereferenced structure.
Note, the static call only calls a callback used when there's a single
callback attached to the tracepoint. If more than one callback is
attached to the same tracepoint, then the static call will call an
iterator function that goes back to dereferencing the structure
keeping the callback and its data tightly coupled again.
Issues can arise when going from 0 callbacks to one, as the static
call is assigned to the callback, and it must take care that the data
passed to it is loaded before the static call calls the callback.
Going from 1 to 2 callbacks is not an issue, as long as the static
call is updated to the iterator before the tracepoint structure array
is updated via RCU. Going from 2 to more or back down to 2 is not an
issue as the iterator can handle all theses cases. But going from 2 to
1, care must be taken as the static call is now calling a callback and
the data that is loaded must be the data for that callback.
Care was taken to ensure the callback and data would be in-sync, but
after a bug was reported, it became clear that not enough was done to
make sure that was the case. These changes address this.
The first change is to compare the old and new data instead of the old
and new callback, as it's the data that can corrupt the callback, even
if the callback is the same (something getting freed).
The next change is to convert these transitions into states, to make
it easier to know when a synchronization is needed, and to perform
those synchronizations. The problem with this patch is that it slows
down disabling all events from under a second, to making it take over
10 seconds to do the same work. But that is addressed in the final
patch.
The final patch uses the RCU state functions to keep track of the RCU
state between the transitions, and only needs to perform the
synchronization if an RCU synchronization hasn't been done already.
This brings the performance of disabling all events back to its
original value. That's because no synchronization is required between
disabling tracepoints but is required when enabling a tracepoint after
its been disabled. If an RCU synchronization happens after the
tracepoint is disabled, and before it is re-enabled, there's no need
to do the synchronization again.
Both the second and third patch have subtle complexities that they are
separated into two patches. But because the second patch causes such a
regression in performance, the third patch adds a "Fixes" tag to the
second patch, such that the two must be backported together and not
just the second patch"
* tag 'trace-v5.14-rc4-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace:
tracepoint: Use rcu get state and cond sync for static call updates
tracepoint: Fix static call function vs data state mismatch
tracepoint: static call: Compare data on transition from 2->1 callees
projects / kernel.git / commitdiff