mm: fix wrong kunmap_atomic() pointer

mm: fix wrong kunmap_atomic() pointer

Running a ktest.pl test, I hit the following bug on x86_32:

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:81 __kunmap_atomic+0x64/0xc1()
   Hardware name:
  Modules linked in:
  Pid: 93, comm: sh Not tainted 2.6.39-test+ #1
  Call Trace:
   [<c04450da>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0x91
   [<c042f5df>] ? __kunmap_atomic+0x64/0xc1
   [<c042f5df>] ? __kunmap_atomic+0x64/0xc1^M
   [<c0445111>] warn_slowpath_null+0x22/0x24
   [<c042f5df>] __kunmap_atomic+0x64/0xc1
   [<c04d4a22>] unmap_vmas+0x43a/0x4e0
   [<c04d9065>] exit_mmap+0x91/0xd2
   [<c0443057>] mmput+0x43/0xad
   [<c0448358>] exit_mm+0x111/0x119
   [<c044855f>] do_exit+0x1ff/0x5fa
   [<c0454ea2>] ? set_current_blocked+0x3c/0x40
   [<c0454f24>] ? sigprocmask+0x7e/0x8e
   [<c0448b55>] do_group_exit+0x65/0x88
   [<c0448b90>] sys_exit_group+0x18/0x1c
   [<c0c3915f>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
  ---[ end trace 8055f74ea3c0eb62 ]---

Running a ktest.pl git bisect, found the culprit: commit dba38b10db4f
("mm: extended batches for generic mmu_gather")

But although this was the commit triggering the bug, it was not the one
originally responsible for the bug.  That was commit 26f9cf516e88 ("mm:
mmu_gather rework").

The code in zap_pte_range() has something that looks like the following:

	pte =  pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
	do {
		[...]
	} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
	pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);

The pte starts off pointing at the first element in the page table
directory that was returned by the pte_offset_map_lock().  When it's done
with the page, pte will be pointing to anything between the next entry and
the first entry of the next page inclusive.  By doing a pte - 1, this puts
the pte back onto the original page, which is all that pte_unmap_unlock()
needs.

In most archs (64 bit), this is not an issue as the pte is ignored in the
pte_unmap_unlock().  But on 32 bit archs, where things may be kmapped, it
is essential that the pte passed to pte_unmap_unlock() resides on the same
page that was given by pte_offest_map_lock().

The problem came in 26f9cf51 ("mm: mmu_gather rework") where it introduced
a "break;" from the while loop.  This alone did not seem to easily trigger
the bug.  But the modifications made by dba38b10d caused that "break;" to
be hit on the first iteration, before the pte++.

The pte not being incremented will now cause pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1) to
be pointing to the previous page.  This will cause the wrong page to be
unmapped, and also trigger the warning above.

The simple solution is to just save the pointer given by
pte_offset_map_lock() and use it in the unlock.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>