net/mlx5e: Fix cleanup null-ptr deref on encap lock

net/mlx5e: Fix cleanup null-ptr deref on encap lock

[ Upstream commit 301471d798d1670c5a7d434b482e1c06338dcc62 ]

During module is unloaded while a peer tc flow is still offloaded,
first the peer uplink rep profile is changed to a nic profile, and so
neigh encap lock is destroyed. Next during unload, the VF reps netdevs
are unregistered which causes the original non-peer tc flow to be deleted,
which deletes the peer flow. The peer flow deletion detaches the encap
entry and try to take the already destroyed encap lock, causing the
below trace.

Fix this by clearing peer flows during tc eswitch cleanup
(mlx5e_tc_esw_cleanup()).

Relevant trace:
[ 4316.837128] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000001d8
[ 4316.842239] RIP: 0010:__mutex_lock+0xb5/0xc40
[ 4316.851897] Call Trace:
[ 4316.852481]  <TASK>
[ 4316.857214]  mlx5e_rep_neigh_entry_release+0x93/0x790 [mlx5_core]
[ 4316.858258]  mlx5e_rep_encap_entry_detach+0xa7/0xf0 [mlx5_core]
[ 4316.859134]  mlx5e_encap_dealloc+0xa3/0xf0 [mlx5_core]
[ 4316.859867]  clean_encap_dests.part.0+0x5c/0xe0 [mlx5_core]
[ 4316.860605]  mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_flow+0x32a/0x810 [mlx5_core]
[ 4316.862609]  __mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peer_flow+0x1a2/0x250 [mlx5_core]
[ 4316.863394]  mlx5e_tc_del_flow+0x(/0x630 [mlx5_core]
[ 4316.864090]  mlx5e_flow_put+0x5f/0x100 [mlx5_core]
[ 4316.864771]  mlx5e_delete_flower+0x4de/0xa40 [mlx5_core]
[ 4316.865486]  tc_setup_cb_reoffload+0x20/0x80
[ 4316.865905]  fl_reoffload+0x47c/0x510 [cls_flower]
[ 4316.869181]  tcf_block_playback_offloads+0x91/0x1d0
[ 4316.869649]  tcf_block_unbind+0xe7/0x1b0
[ 4316.870049]  tcf_block_offload_cmd.isra.0+0x1ee/0x270
[ 4316.879266]  tcf_block_offload_unbind+0x61/0xa0
[ 4316.879711]  __tcf_block_put+0xa4/0x310

Fixes: de2adb12c9ef ("net/mlx5e: Infrastructure for duplicated offloading of TC flows")
Fixes: 519580ce09c1 ("net/mlx5e: Duplicate offloaded TC eswitch rules under uplink LAG")
Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Mi <cmi@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>