mm/slub.c: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock

mm/slub.c: avoid slub allocation while holding list_lock

If we are already under list_lock, don't call kmalloc().  Otherwise we
will run into a deadlock because kmalloc() also tries to grab the same
lock.

Fix the problem by using a static bitmap instead.

  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  --------------------------------------------
  mount-encrypted/4921 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&(&n->list_lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: ___slab_alloc+0x104/0x437

  but task is already holding lock:
  (&(&n->list_lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x81/0x3cb

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&(&n->list_lock)->rlock);
    lock(&(&n->list_lock)->rlock);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108193958.205102-2-yuzhao@google.com
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>