From cb8083e0576f41a14c4fa3d929aaa0a6c6f7a244 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:20:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: Fix lockdep warning resolving supplies With commit 22772950654997 (regulator: core: avoid regulator_resolve_supply() race condition) we started holding the rdev lock while resolving supplies, an operation that requires holding the regulator_list_mutex. This results in lockdep warnings since in other places we take the list mutex then the mutex on an individual rdev. Since the goal is to make sure that we don't call set_supply() twice rather than a concern about the cost of resolution pull the rdev lock and check for duplicate resolution down to immediately before we do the set_supply() and drop it again once the allocation is done. Fixes: 22772950654997 (regulator: core: avoid regulator_resolve_supply() race condition) Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210122132042.10306-1-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index cfc3bc9df93a0..67a768fe5b2a3 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -1823,17 +1823,6 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) if (rdev->supply) return 0; - /* - * Recheck rdev->supply with rdev->mutex lock held to avoid a race - * between rdev->supply null check and setting rdev->supply in - * set_supply() from concurrent tasks. - */ - regulator_lock(rdev); - - /* Supply just resolved by a concurrent task? */ - if (rdev->supply) - goto out; - r = regulator_dev_lookup(dev, rdev->supply_name); if (IS_ERR(r)) { ret = PTR_ERR(r); @@ -1885,12 +1874,29 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) goto out; } + /* + * Recheck rdev->supply with rdev->mutex lock held to avoid a race + * between rdev->supply null check and setting rdev->supply in + * set_supply() from concurrent tasks. + */ + regulator_lock(rdev); + + /* Supply just resolved by a concurrent task? */ + if (rdev->supply) { + regulator_unlock(rdev); + put_device(&r->dev); + goto out; + } + ret = set_supply(rdev, r); if (ret < 0) { + regulator_unlock(rdev); put_device(&r->dev); goto out; } + regulator_unlock(rdev); + /* * In set_machine_constraints() we may have turned this regulator on * but we couldn't propagate to the supply if it hadn't been resolved @@ -1906,7 +1912,6 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) } out: - regulator_unlock(rdev); return ret; } -- 2.39.5