x86/ibt: Add IBT feature, MSR and #CP handling

x86/ibt: Add IBT feature, MSR and #CP handling

The bits required to make the hardware go.. Of note is that, provided
the syscall entry points are covered with ENDBR, #CP doesn't need to
be an IST because we'll never hit the syscall gap.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308154318.582331711@infradead.org