]> git.baikalelectronics.ru Git - kernel.git/commit
ext4: check journal inode extents more carefully
authorJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:04:34 +0000 (15:04 +0200)
committerTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:12:36 +0000 (14:12 -0400)
commit7d944b09aaa564a622b07e351df74b66b478d2a0
tree63ee586b0b46cd614ea4f75b50637a6e8ddb64e5
parent9e8c85687b73898db9363e84897d7e543a282a4a
ext4: check journal inode extents more carefully

Currently, system zones just track ranges of block, that are "important"
fs metadata (bitmaps, group descriptors, journal blocks, etc.). This
however complicates how extent tree (or indirect blocks) can be checked
for inodes that actually track such metadata - currently the journal
inode but arguably we should be treating quota files or resize inode
similarly. We cannot run __ext4_ext_check() on such metadata inodes when
loading their extents as that would immediately trigger the validity
checks and so we just hack around that and special-case the journal
inode. This however leads to a situation that a journal inode which has
extent tree of depth at least one can have invalid extent tree that gets
unnoticed until ext4_cache_extents() crashes.

To overcome this limitation, track inode number each system zone belongs
to (0 is used for zones not belonging to any inode). We can then verify
inode number matches the expected one when verifying extent tree and
thus avoid the false errors. With this there's no need to to
special-case journal inode during extent tree checking anymore so remove
it.

Fixes: 601cacc7e6fd ("ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode")
Reported-by: Wolfgang Frisch <wolfgang.frisch@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728130437.7804-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
fs/ext4/block_validity.c
fs/ext4/ext4.h
fs/ext4/extents.c
fs/ext4/indirect.c
fs/ext4/inode.c
fs/ext4/mballoc.c