]> git.baikalelectronics.ru Git - kernel.git/commit
s390: use common bust_spinlocks()
authorSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Thu, 25 Oct 2018 07:05:43 +0000 (16:05 +0900)
committerMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Fri, 30 Nov 2018 06:22:05 +0000 (07:22 +0100)
commit2be3b3dee4b2d4fbe1923d0ae1fdd72b8dfa3887
tree07d87341b8dcd2a59e12e1ca5b3b310e242a3701
parentb372f5c3642f84f31fc9870c5f2fba8b6a172a7d
s390: use common bust_spinlocks()

s390 is the only architecture that is using own bust_spinlocks()
variant, while other arch-s seem to be OK with the common
implementation.

Heiko Carstens [1] said he would prefer s390 to use the common
bust_spinlocks() as well:
  I did some code archaeology and this function is unchanged since ~17
  years. When it was introduced it was close to identical to the x86
  variant. All other architectures use the common code variant in the
  meantime. So if we change this I'd prefer that we switch s390 to the
  common code variant as well. Right now I can't see a reason for not
  doing that

This patch removes s390 bust_spinlocks() and drops the weak attribute
from the common bust_spinlocks() version.

[1] lkml.kernel.org/r/20181025062800.GB4037@osiris
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
arch/s390/mm/fault.c
lib/bust_spinlocks.c